Page 90 - Basics of Fluid Mechanics and Introduction to Computational Fluid Dynamics
P. 90

Dynamics  of Inviscid  Fluids                                                               75


             whose  focuses  are  located  at  the  points  A(1,0)  and  A‘(—1,0).  In  the

             case  when  r  =  1  the  image  in  the  plane  (Z)  will  be  the  segment  [—1,1]
             run  in  both  senses  (on  the  “upper  border”  and  then,  in  the  opposite
             sense,  on  the  “lower  border”).          Obviously,  in  this  case,  the  considered
             transformation  would  map  both  the  outside  and  inside  of  the  unit  disk
              |Z|  <1,  onto  the  whole  plane  (z)  with  a  cut  along  the  segment  [—1,  1]
              (in  accord  with  the  existence  of  two  inverse  transformations  Z  =  z+

              Vz*  —1,  where,  to  fix  the  ideas,  the  positive  determination  of  the  root
              at  z  =  x  > 1  is  considered).
                 If    is  a  circumference  passing  by  A  and  A’,  its  image  will  be  only  a
             circular  arc  joining  A  and  A’  and  crossing  the  center  C  of  ,  an  arc  which
             is  run  in  both  senses.  Let’s  now  consider  acircumference  I’;  passing  only
             through  the  singular  point  A  (and  not  through  A’).  Its  image  will  be

              a  closed  curve  with  a  sharp  cuspidal  point  at  A  where  the  tangent  is
              the  same  with  that  to  the  arc  ACA’  which  is  also  “the  skeleton”  of  this
              contour.
                 This  image  contour  is  called  the  Joukovski  (wing)  profile,  and  the  ini-
              tial  considered  transformation  is  of  Joukovski  or  Kutta—Joukovski  type.
                                                                         iY
                 Obviously  to  a  fluid  flow  around  I,  of  3  velocity  at  far  field,  it

              could  associate  a  fluid  flow  of  Vo  velocity  at  infinity,  past  the  considered
              Joukovski  profile,  the  incidences  in  both  flows  being  the  same.
                 The  Joukovski  profiles  are  technically  hard  to  make  and  more,  they  are
              not  very  realistic  for  practical  purposes.  That  is  why  their  importance

              is  mainly  theoretical.
                 The  above  Joukovski  type  transformation  could  be  generalized  by
              considering
                                                        1         R?
                                                 z=  5 (z  +  =)



              or  even  zg  =  Z+  Rr      the  last  transformation  having  the  advantage  of
              equal  velocities  at  far  field  in  the  associated  flows.  We  remark  that  the
              last  form  could  be  rewritten  as


                                              z-2R   (Z—R)\?’

                                              z+2R  \Z+R)’

              and  it  transforms  the  outside  of  |Z|  =  R  onto  the  whole  plane  (z)  with
              a  cut  along  the  segment  [—2R,2R].  A  direct  generalization  would  be


                                       z—kR             Z—R\*
                                                  _                   l<k<2

                                       z+kR          (Fa)  pe  SRSA,

              which  points  out  that
   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95