Page 408 - Battleground The Media Volume 1 and 2
P. 408

Product Placement  | 


              Parodying PlaCeMent
              With movies such as Wayne’s World (see “Product Placement Timeline” sidebar), Hollywood
              has realized the benefits of presenting its placements periodically: not only do producers
              still get the money, but they seemingly escape the accusation of selling out, while the ad-
              vertiser receives prominent exposure and seems cool, hip, and willing to take a joke—an
              arrangement, therefore, calculated to bring both parties maximum benefit. In this regard,
              we might be more impressed by the placement parodies in, for example, the films of Kevin
              Smith (Nails Cigarettes; Discreeto Burritos) and Quentin Tarantino (Big Kahuna Burger; Jack
              Rabbit Slim’s Restaurants). In The Simpsons, fictional brands such as Duff Beer, Lard Lad
              Donuts, or Laramie Cigarettes take the spotlight, thereby drawing viewers’ attention to the
              practices  of  product  placement,  while  also  avoiding  using  this  seeming  lesson  of  media
              literacy as yet another platform for advertising.




                ThE FuTurE oF ProDuCT PLaCEmEnT
                anD ThE FaTE oF ThE moviEs

                With the arrival of reality television, we have witnessed the summary collapse
              of the formal distinction between TV shows and the commercials they once
              sandwiched. Programs such as The Apprentice and Survivor allowed producer
              Mark  Burnett  to  make  vast  sums  in  placement  deals,  basing  entire  episodes
              around the contestants’ need to advertise a certain product in the case of The
              Apprentice, and offering the food-deprived Survivor cast Doritos as a way of en-
              suring endless paeans to the wonders of the nacho chip. Similarly, American Idol
              judges drink nothing but Coca-Cola, The Amazing Race’s family edition showed
              endless scenes of contestants gassing their cars up at BP, and America’s Next Top
              Model’s reward of a Cover Girl contract ensures excited weekly mentions of the
              cosmetics company.
                Movies, though, are not far behind, given their appeal to advertisers, and the
              relative lack of organized resistance to this practice. To take one example: Tom
              Hanks is a celebrated actor, but he’s also a gift to advertisers, since he appears to
              have no qualms at all about cozying up to products, as demonstrated by four of
              the most placement-saturated movies of recent times: Forrest Gump, You’ve Got
              Mail, Cast Away, and The Terminal. Such celebrated film stars of the past were
              reluctant to have their names associated with the commercial necessities of ad-
              vertising. but Hanks’s newest film project is called How Starbucks Saved My Life.
                Nonreality television, too, is growing more placement friendly, with numer-
              ous advertisers experimenting with “old-style” single sponsorship for one-off
              events, as when one season of 24 began without commercials, yet with continu-
              ous loving shots of hero Jack Bauer in his Ford SUV, and as entire episodes of
              the former ratings giant Friends revolved around the characters’ love of certain
              products, such as Pottery Barn furniture.
                Judging  by  industry  figures  (see  “Product  Placement  Timeline”)  we  can
              look forward to more and more placement, which may lead to fewer and fewer
   403   404   405   406   407   408   409   410   411   412   413