Page 489 - Biaxial Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
P. 489

Fatigue Assessment of Mechanical Components Under Complex Multiaxial Loading   473


         and     = 2.828~ for  case  2, Fig.  3(d).  The  results obtained by  various  approaches are
         compared in Table 1.
           It  is  of  interest  to  note  that  the  two  example  cases  have  the  same  stress  amplitudes,
         an,a 2a&,   ax),u 2a, but  different  shear  stress  amplitudes  are  calculated  by  various
                         =
             =
         approaches (see Table  1).  The MCE approach gives the maximum values among the results of
         various approaches, which fully characterizes the non-proportional loading effect.

         COMPUTER PROCEDURE OF THE IMPROVED STRESS-INVARIANTS APPROACH

         The  computer  aided  fatigue  damage evaluations of  engineering components  and  structures
         consist  of  two  parts:  dynamic  stress computations and  fatigue  life  prediction.  Stress  time
         histories  can  be  obtained  either  from  experiments  (mounting sensors  or  transducers  on  a
         physical  component)  or  from  simulation.  The  simulation-based  approach  consists  of
         performing finite element analyses of the component using applied loads. Then, the fatigue life
         prediction can be carried out as a post-processor procedure. After computing the local stress-
         time histories at critical locations of the component by the finite element method, the procedure
         can be as follows:

         1)  Compute the hydrostatic stress part PH(t)  and the deviatoric stress part o'(t)  of  the stress
            vector o(t) at the nodal point of consideration:

                                    a(t) = P" (f).   O'(f)

         2)  Calculate the maximum hydrostatic stress PH,,,,~ during the loading cycle:




         3)  Transform the stress deviator o'(t) to the Reduced Euclidean Space [ 181:
                                     J5         1
                                 SI  =-     s2 = -(dn - 0'22)
                                     2          2



         where dn, dyy, dZ, dq, dxL dyz are the six components of the deviatoric stress vector o'(t), and
         SI, Ss, S3, S4, Ss are the five components of the transformed deviatoric stress vector S(t). With the
         above transformation, the deviatoric stress vector o'(t)  is mapped onto a vector S(t) of  a 5-
         dimensional Euclidean space denoted as E5. The length of  a vector S(t) in E5  is equal to the
         square root of the second invariant of the stress deviator o'(t). In this way, the stress deviator is
         fully described by a smaller number of  components in the transformed space. During periodic
         loading, the tip of the vector S(t) describes a closed curve @' which represents the loading trace
         [181.
         4)  Evaluate the Effective Shear Stress Amplitude   by the MCE approach [ 14, 151:
   484   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494