Page 285 - Big Data Analytics for Intelligent Healthcare Management
P. 285

ACKNOWLEDGMENT          279






                Table 11.2 Assigned Friedman Ranks for All the Classifiers
                              Average Accuracy (in %)
                Datasets      FCM-KA      FCM       Naive Bayes   SVM       Decision Tree  BPNN
                Dermatology   98.42(1)    90.4(3)   95.8(2)       87.1(4)   82(6)          84.3(5)
                Heart         95.19(1)    84.2(2)   75.2(4)       76.4(3)   70.4(6)        72.2(5)
                Ecoli         84.66(1)    84.3(2)   80.7(4)       78.2(5)   77.5(6)        82(3)
                Haberman      94.75(1)    81.6(2)   70.6(3)       65.4(4)   64.2(5)        60.6(6)
                Liver         94.83(1)    76.1(2)   53(6)         62(3)     55.14(5)       60.8(4)
                Hepatitis     96.2(1)     88(3)     89.5(2)       83.2(4)   82.25(5)       80.5(6)
                Pima          94.47(1)    90.2(2)   82.4(5)       89.5(3)   76.2(6)        87.3(4)
                Thyroid       96.81(1)    88.2(4)   89.2(3)       86.4(6)   91.2(2)        86.8(5)
                              1
                Avg.                      2.5       3.62          4         5.12           4.75



                Table 11.3 Results of Statistical Tests
                Test Name            Statistical Value    p-Value        Hypothesis (Accepted/Rejected)
                Friedman             21.51519             .01287         Rejected
                Iman-Davenport       8.147                .00294         Rejected




               11.7 CONCLUSION
               Developing one high-quality optimization algorithm and using it to resolve problematic data mining
               tasks has been an ultimate challenge for researchers. In the current work, a combined approach of FCM
               and the newly developed kidney-inspired algorithm was developed for biomedical applications. All the
               measured datasets were of the biomedical type from the UCI repository. Performance evaluators, such
               as objective function values and accurateness, were used for comparing the results of the projected
               approach with a number of the presented methods. Also, the Friedman test was used to examine
               and confirm the presentation of the anticipated effort. After a wide-ranging experimental analysis,
               it is concluded that the projected technique is able to generate hopeful results compared to other clas-
               sifiers. In addition, some enhanced deviations of KA can lead to further good results. Also, extraction of
               preeminent characteristics with intelligent agents may give enhanced results. As a future scope, this
               research can be extended by using the variations in the parameter of KA and elitist based KA can
               be proposed for solving various data mining problem.




               ACKNOWLEDGMENT
               This research work was partially supported by the Science and Engineering Research Board (SERB), Department
               of Science and Technology (DST), New Delhi, Govt. of India, under the research project grant (Sanction Order No
               EEQ/2017/000355).
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290