Page 69 - Biofuels Refining and Performance
P. 69

52   Chapter Two


           TABLE 2.1 Differences between C 3 and C 4 Plants
                Plant
             characteristics        C 3 cycle type          C 4 cycle type

           Leaf anatomy         Mesophyll (palisade and   Krantz anatomy, bundle-
                                 spongy type), no chloroplasts   sheath cell with
                                 in bundle-sheath cell    chloroplasts
           Chloroplasts         Single-type              Dimorphic
           Carboxylase type     Primary (Rubisco)        Primary PEPCase in
                                                          mesophyll, Secondary
                                                          (Rubisco in bundle-
                                                          sheath cell)
           Primary CO 2 acceptor  RuBP                   PEP
           Primary stable product  3-phosphoglyceric acid (3-PGA)  Oxalocetate (OAA)
           Ratio of CO 2 :ATP:NADPH  1:3:2               1:5:2
           Productivity (ton/ha 
 yr)  ~20               ~30




           grown on a repetitive cropping mode for continuous and maximum
           production of biomass. Grasses such as Bermuda grass, Sudan grass,
           sugarcane, and sorghum are good candidates for energy generation from
           biomass. A comparison of the characteristics of C and C plants, in
                                                                 4
                                                          3
           terms of leaf anatomy, is shown in Table 2.1.

           2.4  Plant Types and Growing Cycles
           Several plants have been proposed to be good sources of energy. These
           include woody crops and grasses/herbaceous plants, starch and sugar
           crops and oilseeds, fast growing trees such as hybrid poplars, shrubs
           such as willows, and so forth. Energy crops can be grown on agricultural
           lands not utilized for food, feed, and fiber. Farmers could plant these
           crops along the riverbanks, along lakeshores, between farms and nat-
           ural forests, or on wetlands. These crops could be a good source of alter-
           nate income, reducing the risk of fluctuating markets and stabilizing
           farm income. Woody plants, herbaceous plants/grasses, and aquatic
           plants are different sources for biomass production. The type of biomass
           selected determines the form of energy conversion process. For instance,
           sugarcane has high moisture content, and therefore, a “wet/aqueous”
           bioconversion process, such as fermentation, is the predominant method
           of use. For a low-moisture content type such as wood, gasification, pyrol-
           ysis, or combustion are the more cost-effective ways of conversion.
             Characteristics of an ideal energy crop are mentioned below:

             Low energy input to produce
             Low nutrient requirements
             Tolerance to abiotic and biotic stresses
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74