Page 380 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 380

Fuzzy MCDM for ranking the biofuels production pathways  335


              Liou, J.J., 2013. New concepts and trends of MCDM for tomorrow—in honor of professor
                 Gwo Hshiung Tzeng on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ.
                 19 (2), 367–375.
              Liou, J.J., Tzeng, G.H., 2012. Comments on “multiple criteria decision making (MCDM)
                 methods in economics: an overview”. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 18 (4), 672–695.
              Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Md Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., Valipour, A., 2015. Multiple
                 criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature
                 from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res. 28 (1), 516–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/
                 1331677x.2015.1075139.
              Peneva, V., Popchev, I., 2008. Multicriteria decision making based on fuzzy relations. Cyber
                 Inf. Technol. 8 (4), 3–12.
              Perimenis, A., Walimwipi, H., Zinoviev, S., M€uller-Langer, F., Miertus, S., 2011. Devel-
                 opment of a decision support tool for the assessment of biofuels. Energy Policy
                 39 (3), 1782–1793.
              Phalan, B., 2009. The social and environmental impacts of biofuels in Asia: an overview.
                 Appl. Energy 86 (1), S21–S29.
              Ren, J., Fedele, A., Mason, M., Manzardo, A., Scipioni, A., 2013. Fuzzy multi-actor multi-
                 criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for
                 hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (22), 9111–9120.
              Ren, J., Tan, S., Dong, L., Mazzi, A., Scipioni, A., Sovacool, B.K., 2014. Determining the
                 life cycle energy efficiency of six biofuel systems in China: a data envelopment analysis.
                 Bioresour. Technol. 162, 1–7.
              Sadeghzadeh, K., Salehi, M.B., 2011. Mathematical analysis of fuel cell strategic technologies
                 development solutions in the automotive industry by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision
                 making method. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 36, 13272–13280.
              Scott, J.A., Ho, W., Dey, P.K., 2012. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods
                 for bioenergy systems. Energy 42 (1), 146–156.
              Tsai, H.C., Hsiao, S.W., 2004. Evaluation of alternatives for product customization using
                 fuzzy logic. Inf. Sci. 158, 233–262.
              Wang, T.C., Chen, Y.H., 2011. Fuzzy multi-criteria selection among transportation com-
                 panies with fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 11884–11890.
              Wei, G.W., 2010. Theory and Methods of Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on
                 Fuzzy Information. China Economic Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
              Xu, Z., 2002. A method for priorities of triangular fuzzy number comparison judgment
                 matrices. Fuzzy Syst. Math. 16 (1), 47–50 (in Chinese).
              Yazdani-Chamzini, A., 2014. An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making
                 model for handling equipment selection. J. Civil Eng. Manag. 20 (5), 660–673.
                 https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802714.
              Yuen, K.K.F., Lau, H.C., 2011. A fuzzy group analytical hierarchy process approach for soft-
                 ware quality assurance management: fuzzy logarithmic least squares method. Expert Syst.
                 Appl. 38 (8), 10292–10302.
              Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8, 338–353.


              Further reading
              Tzeng, G.H., Huang, J.J., 2011. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Appli-
                 cations. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385