Page 380 - Biofuels for a More Sustainable Future
P. 380
Fuzzy MCDM for ranking the biofuels production pathways 335
Liou, J.J., 2013. New concepts and trends of MCDM for tomorrow—in honor of professor
Gwo Hshiung Tzeng on the occasion of his 70th birthday. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ.
19 (2), 367–375.
Liou, J.J., Tzeng, G.H., 2012. Comments on “multiple criteria decision making (MCDM)
methods in economics: an overview”. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 18 (4), 672–695.
Mardani, A., Jusoh, A., Md Nor, K., Khalifah, Z., Zakwan, N., Valipour, A., 2015. Multiple
criteria decision-making techniques and their applications – a review of the literature
from 2000 to 2014. Econ. Res. 28 (1), 516–571. https://doi.org/10.1080/
1331677x.2015.1075139.
Peneva, V., Popchev, I., 2008. Multicriteria decision making based on fuzzy relations. Cyber
Inf. Technol. 8 (4), 3–12.
Perimenis, A., Walimwipi, H., Zinoviev, S., M€uller-Langer, F., Miertus, S., 2011. Devel-
opment of a decision support tool for the assessment of biofuels. Energy Policy
39 (3), 1782–1793.
Phalan, B., 2009. The social and environmental impacts of biofuels in Asia: an overview.
Appl. Energy 86 (1), S21–S29.
Ren, J., Fedele, A., Mason, M., Manzardo, A., Scipioni, A., 2013. Fuzzy multi-actor multi-
criteria decision making for sustainability assessment of biomass-based technologies for
hydrogen production. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 38 (22), 9111–9120.
Ren, J., Tan, S., Dong, L., Mazzi, A., Scipioni, A., Sovacool, B.K., 2014. Determining the
life cycle energy efficiency of six biofuel systems in China: a data envelopment analysis.
Bioresour. Technol. 162, 1–7.
Sadeghzadeh, K., Salehi, M.B., 2011. Mathematical analysis of fuel cell strategic technologies
development solutions in the automotive industry by the TOPSIS multi-criteria decision
making method. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 36, 13272–13280.
Scott, J.A., Ho, W., Dey, P.K., 2012. A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods
for bioenergy systems. Energy 42 (1), 146–156.
Tsai, H.C., Hsiao, S.W., 2004. Evaluation of alternatives for product customization using
fuzzy logic. Inf. Sci. 158, 233–262.
Wang, T.C., Chen, Y.H., 2011. Fuzzy multi-criteria selection among transportation com-
panies with fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 11884–11890.
Wei, G.W., 2010. Theory and Methods of Multiple Attribute Decision Making Based on
Fuzzy Information. China Economic Publishing House, Beijing (in Chinese).
Xu, Z., 2002. A method for priorities of triangular fuzzy number comparison judgment
matrices. Fuzzy Syst. Math. 16 (1), 47–50 (in Chinese).
Yazdani-Chamzini, A., 2014. An integrated fuzzy multi criteria group decision making
model for handling equipment selection. J. Civil Eng. Manag. 20 (5), 660–673.
https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802714.
Yuen, K.K.F., Lau, H.C., 2011. A fuzzy group analytical hierarchy process approach for soft-
ware quality assurance management: fuzzy logarithmic least squares method. Expert Syst.
Appl. 38 (8), 10292–10302.
Zadeh, L.A., 1965. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8, 338–353.
Further reading
Tzeng, G.H., Huang, J.J., 2011. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Appli-
cations. Chapman and Hall/CRC.