Page 97 - Biomass Gasification, Pyrolysis And Torrefaction Practical Design and Theory
P. 97

Chapter | 3  Biomass Characteristics                          75


             (CaCO 3 ) is required which will release 1 mol of additional carbon dioxide
             during the production of CaO from CaCO 3 .In reality,much more 2 4mol of
             limestone is required due to imperfect sulfation of the calcined limestone.
             Thus, for capture of sulfur dioxide, considerable amount of additional carbon
             dioxide is generated.
                Biomass, in addition to being CO 2 neutral, results in additional reduction
             in CO 2 emission because of the absence of sulfur capture-related CO 2
             emission as needed for many fossil fuels as described above.


             3.6.2 Proximate Analysis

             Proximate analysis gives the composition of the biomass in terms of gross
             components such as moisture (M), volatile matter (VM), ash (ASH), and
             fixed carbon (FC). It is a relatively simple and inexpensive process.
             Table 3.11 compares the proximate analysis of corn cob and rice husk mea-
             sured in two different techniques.

             3.6.2.1 Volatile Matter
             The volatile matter of a fuel is the condensable and noncondensable vapor
             released when the fuel is heated. Its amount depends on the rate of heating
             and the temperature to which it is heated. Options for its measurement are
             discussed in Chapter 13.

             3.6.2.2 Ash
             Ash is the inorganic solid residue left after the fuel is completely burned. Its
             primary ingredients are silica, aluminum, iron, and calcium; small amounts
             of magnesium, titanium, sodium, and potassium may also be present.
                Strictly speaking, this ash does not represent the original inorganic min-
             eral matter in the fuel, as some of the ash constituents can undergo oxidation
             during burning. For exact analysis, correction may be needed. The ash


               TABLE 3.11 Comparison of Proximate Analysis of Biomass Measured by
               Two Methods

               Fuel      FC (% dry)  VM (% dry)  ASH (% dry)  Technique Used
               Corncobs  18.5        80.1         1.4         ASTM
                         16.2        80.2        30.6         TG
               Husk-rice  16.7       65.5        17.9         ASTM
                         19.9        60.6        19.5         TG
               Source: Compiled from Klass (1998, p. 239).
   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102