Page 402 - Biomedical Engineering and Design Handbook Volume 2, Applications
P. 402

380  SURGERY

                       realism and haptic feedback. Their simplicity makes them relatively inexpensive. They are typically
                       used for teaching widely-performed, relatively straightforward procedures with well-defined algo-
                                                          10
                                                                       11
                                                9
                       rithms. Simulations of spinal biopsy, nerve blocks, vascular access, and interventional cardiology 12
                       are some successful examples of simulations of needle- and catheter-based procedures.
                       Minimally Invasive Surgery.  Minimally invasive surgery is a revolutionary surgical technique,
                       where the surgery is performed with instruments and viewing equipment inserted through small inci-
                       sions (typically, less than 10 mm in diameter) rather than by making a large incision to expose and
                       provide access to the operation site. Minimally invasive operations include laparoscopy (abdominal
                       cavity), thoracoscopy (chest cavity), arthroscopy (joints), pelviscopy (pelvis), and angioscopy (blood
                       vessels). The main advantage of this technique is the reduced trauma to healthy tissue, which is the
                       leading cause of patients’ postoperative pain and long hospital stay. The hospital stay and rest peri-
                       ods, and therefore the procedure costs, can be significantly reduced with minimally invasive surgery.
                       However, minimally invasive procedures are more demanding on the surgeon, requiring more diffi-
                       cult surgical techniques.
                         The virtual environments-based training simulators in the literature are mostly for minimally
                       invasive surgery applications. This is not a coincidence. In addition to the need for better training
                       tools for minimally invasive surgery, the constraints which make minimally invasive surgery difficult
                       are the same reasons that make building simulators for minimally invasive surgery more manageable
                       with existing technology. It is significantly easier to imitate the user interface for minimally invasive
                       surgery, limited and well-constrained haptic interaction, and limited amount and quality of feedback
                       (visual and otherwise) available.
                         Examples of simulators for minimally invasive surgery include Refs. 13 to 16. Several commer-
                       cial laparoscopic surgery training simulators are also available, including systems developed by
                                           18
                                                            19
                                   17
                       Surgical Science, Mentice, Immersion Medical, and Simbionix. 20
                       Open Surgery. In open surgery, the surgeon has a direct visual view of the operation site, and
                       directly interacts with the biological tissue for manipulation. Open surgery is significantly less struc-
                       tured compared to minimally invasive surgery. Furthermore, the surgeon has significantly more free-
                       dom of motion, and the amount and quality of tactile and visual feedback is higher. As a result,
                       simulation of open surgery is remains challenging. Considerable advances in haptic devices and
                       algorithms, deformable object modeling and simulation, user interface development, and real-time
                       computer graphics are needed for realistic simulation of open surgery. The existing simulations, as
                       a result, focus more on training simulators for individual skill rather than complete procedures.
                       Examples of open surgical simulators include Refs. 21 to 23.



           13.2.2 Components of Virtual Environment-Based
           Surgical Simulators
                       The construction of a virtual environment-based surgical simulation starts with development of
                       three-dimensional geometric models of the structures in the surgical anatomy (Fig. 13.2). The geo-
                       metric models are constructed from medical diagnostic images, and can be generic or patient spe-
                       cific. Typically, computerized tomography and magnetic resonance images are used for construction
                       of anatomical models. Computerized tomography images typically have higher image resolution.
                       Magnetic resonance images, on the other hand, have better contrast in soft tissues. Magnetic reso-
                       nance imaging is also preferable as it does not involve ionizing radiation. The volumetric data of the
                       medical diagnostic images are first segmented to identify individual anatomical entities, and then
                       converted to geometric models for use in the subsequent parts of the development. Two types of geo-
                       metric models are typically generated. Surface models are triangulated meshes that represent the
                       boundaries of the anatomical entities. Volumetric geometric models are tetrahedral meshes that rep-
                       resent the geometry of the interior of the anatomical entities. Surface geometry is used in graphical
                       rendering of the virtual environment, while volumetric geometry is used in simulation of the physi-
                       cal behavior of the anatomical entities.
   397   398   399   400   401   402   403   404   405   406   407