Page 285 - Bridge and Highway Structure Rehabilitation and Repair
P. 285

260            SECTION 2                                        STRENGTHENING AND REPAIR WORK



                            For non-composite and non-compact sections, service II limit state does not need to be
                        checked.
                            Maximum positive moment evaluation method is applicable to both single span and con-
                        tinuous beams. However, the maximum negative moment evaluation method is only applicable
                        to continuous beams. Maximum positive moments in equal span continuous bridges can be
                        calculated using a similar approach as used for single spans.
                            Footprints of continuous span bridges show that they are likely to be of unequal span lengths.
                        Hence, a simplified analysis approach giving a summary of results cannot be formulated. Instead,


                        the influence line method or continuous beam analysis results using conventional three moments
                        theorem are presented and compared to those from computer programs.
                            Maximum bending moments:
                        1. Positive moment at midspan for a variety of loads (non-symmetric axle 4 lane).

                        2. Positive moment at midspan for alternate tandem axle loads (symmetric axle 4 lane).
                        3. Negative moment at supports for non-symmetric axle loads 4 lane loads.

                        6.5.7 Shear Design
                            Strength I limit state:
                            SF at girder ends: Compute V DC4DW
                                           Compute V
                                                     LL4IM
                            Girder web D , t :
                                          w
                                       W
                            Required end panel transverse stiffener spacing for stiffened girders   1.5 D.
                            Shear resistance of end panel:
                              Maximum shear forces:
                              Maximum shear force at supports for variety of loads (non-symmetric axle 4 lane)

                            Results of a simplified analysis approach can be presented in a summary of tables. The
                        comparative study would help in frequently used design and rating for moments and forces.

                        6.6  RATING OF SECONDARY STRUCTURAL MEMBERS

                        6.6.1  Summary of Rating Procedure for Transverse and Bearing Stiffeners
                            (Provided for ready reference)
                        1. Strength Limit States I and II
                        2. Refer to (6.10.8) Stiffeners
                        3. Refer to (6.10.8.2.1) for Bearing Stiffener Location
                        4. Refer to (6.10.8.2) for Axial Resistance and Bearing Stiffener Geometry


                        6.6.2 Shear Connectors
                            (Provided for ready reference)
                        1. Strength Limit States I and II
                        2. Refer to Sec. 6.10.7.4 for shear connectors.
                            The following steps are provided for ready reference. Prior to developing a software or for
                        solving the equations using hand calculations, equations need to be checked against the latest

                        version of applicable AASHTO LRFD Specifications or LRFR Manual.
   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290