Page 198 - Carbon Nanotube Fibres and Yarns
P. 198

188   Carbon Nanotube Fibers and Yarns




























          Fig. 8.2  A simple fracture model for CNT yarn. (A) Simple model of the fiber as collec-
          tion of fibrous elements. (B) Tensile fracture of fiber involving failure in shear between
          the fibrous elements. (C) SEM micrograph of actual CNT fiber having undergone failure
          in tensile test (scale bar 10 μm). (Reproduced with permission from J.J. Vilatela, J.A. Elliott,
          A.H. Windle, A model for the strength of yarn-like carbon nanotube fibres. ACS Nano 5 (3)
          (2011) 1921–1927.)


          a simple fracture model similar to the yarn model used by Daniels in 1945
          [84], which comprises a collection of parallel, rigid rods that can slide with
          respect to each other, as illustrated in Fig. 8.2. Tensile stress is applied to
          either end of the fiber, resulting in failure when the fibrous elements have
          slid out of contact at a stress assumed to be well below the internal failure
          strength of the fibrous elements. The determination of the failure strength
          by shear between the elements requires an estimate of the total area of shear
          failure and the shear strength of the interfaces. To do so, a formula to predict
          the specific strength was proposed (in unit N/tex),
                                     1         L
                                σ =    ΩΩ τ      ×10 6                 (8.3)
                                 y
                                    ν G  1  2  F  8
                                                                      −6
          where v G  is the areal density of a single graphene sheet (0.75 × 10  kg/
            2
          m ), τ F  is the interfacial fracture strength in shear, L is the mean length of
          the fibrous elements, and Ω 1  and Ω 2  are the fraction of the total number of
          graphene layers on the outside of the element and the fraction of the surface
          between the contacted elements. This equation has a pleasing simplicity
          as a result of using specific stress, and is consistent with the fact that the
   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203