Page 22 - Carbon Nanotube Fibres and Yarns
P. 22

Yarn production from carbon nanotube forests   15


              before the catalyst deposition. A carrier gas, for example, helium, and a
              carbon source, such as acetylene [7, 9–12] or ethylene [11, 13, 14], are used.
              The diameter distribution and number of walls of the CNTs in a forest can
              be controlled to some extent by varying the thicknesses of the catalyst layer
              and the length of nanotubes by growth time [15]. Water vapor can be used
              to prolong CNT growth resulting in longer CNTs [11].
                 Cui et al. [16] studied the effects of reaction conditions on the growth
              rate of CNT forests (CNT length) in CVD using Fe catalyst on Si wafer,
              C 2 H 2  as carbon source, and H 2  as inhibitor for carbonaceous species. They
              found that the optimum reaction conditions were achieved at a temperature
              of 750°C, acetylene flow rate of 60 sccm, and H 2  flow rate of 0.5 SLPM.
              The CNT growth rate became very low after 10 min.
                 Huyhn et  al.  [18] carried out a recycling analysis of Si substrate for
              spinnable CNT growth. A 100% regrowth in forest height and mass yield
              of CNTs were achieved in the first four cycles, but these parameters fell to
              about 20% in the fifth cycle. A decrease in nanotube diameter and increase
              in areal density were also observed.
                 A floating catalyst CVD method was used for the production of spin-
              nable CNT forests using a two-stage synthesis process. The CNT arrays
              were grown on silica (quartz flake) using ferrocene as catalyst precursor and
              cyclohexane as solvent and carbon source [19, 20]. The main advantages
              of the floating catalyst method are that it requires simple equipment and
              eliminates the procedure for the preparation of catalyst layers on substrates.


              2.2  Drawing a CNT web
              2.2.1  Formation of a continuous web from CNT forest
              Several groups studied forest drawability using experimental and modeling
              techniques and proposed a number of working mechanisms. Zhang et al.
              [21] ascribed drawability to the intermittent bundling of CNTs within the
              forest in which individual nanotubes migrate from one bundle of a few
              nanotubes to another. Bundled nanotubes are simultaneously pulled from
              different elevations in the forest sidewall, so that they join with bundled
              nanotubes that have reached the top and bottom of the forest. Disordered
              regions at the top and bottom of the forests, where a fraction of the nano-
              tubes form loops, might help maintain continuity. They also reported that
              for forests having similar topology, the highest forests were easiest to draw
              into sheets, probably because increasing the nanotube length increases in-
              terfibril mechanical coupling within the web.
   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27