Page 247 - Challenges in Corrosion Costs Causes Consequences and Control(2015)
P. 247

CORROSION CONTROL OF BRIDGES                                    225

            rebar decks as evaluated by transportation agencies was good. The epoxy-coated rebar
            did not perform as well in cracked concrete as it did in uncracked concrete. Corro-
            sion was observed on epoxy-coated rebars extracted from locations having heavy
            cracking, shallow concrete cover, high concrete permeability and high chloride con-
            centrations. Reduced adhesion and softening of coating occurs because of prolonged
            exposure to a moist environment. The number of defects in the epoxy coating had
            a strong influence on the adhesion and performance of epoxy-coated bar. There was
            no significant premature concrete deterioration that can be attributed to corrosion of
            the epoxy-coated rebar. Thus use of good-quality concrete cover, adequate inspec-
            tion finishing and curing of concrete and the use of epoxy-coated rebar resulted in
            effective corrosion for bridge decks since 1975.
              At present, epoxy-coated rebar is the most common corrosion protection sys-
            tem and is used in 48 states. At present, there are nearly 20,000 bridge decks using
            fusion-bonded epoxy-coated rebar as the preferred protection system. This amounts
            to nearly 95% of new deck construction since the early 1980s.
              The data from the Concrete Reinforcing Steel Institute (CRSI) shows that more
                                                                     2
            than 3.6 billion kg (4 million tons) of epoxy-coated rebar (150 million m reinforced
            concrete) were used as of 1998. A significant amount of the epoxy-coated rebar
            was used in bridge decks. Over time, the formulation of epoxy has been modified
            to achieve better performance of the epoxy coating.

            4.9.1.2  Metal-Coated/Clad Rebars and Solid Corrosion-Resistant Alloy Rebars
            The most promising corrosion-resistant rebars are galvanized (zinc-coated) rebars,
            stainless steel-clad rebars, and solid stainless steel rebars. Titanium has also
            been considered as a rebar metal, but its cost is prohibitive although it is highly
            corrosion-resistant.

            4.9.1.2.1  Galvanized Rebars Hot-dipped galvanized coatings for reinforcing steel
            in concrete have been used since the 1940s. ASTM A767 “Standard Specification
            for Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) Steel Bars for Concrete Reinforcement” specifies the
                                                                          3
            requirements for the galvanized coating. Class I coating has 1070 g of zinc per m , and
                            3
            class II has 610 g/m . The effectiveness of galvanized rebars in extending the life of
            reinforced concrete structures is questionable. In other applications, galvanized steel
            has been useful in extending the life of structures exposed to atmospheric conditions
            and low-chloride underground environments though not high-chloride environments.
            Although galvanized rebar may prove to be beneficial in certain chloride media it
            may not withstand the degree of corrosivity of deicing salts.

            4.9.1.2.2  Stainless Steel Rebars Research in stainless steel rebars consists of clad
            stainless steel over a carbon steel substrate and solid stainless steel rebar. The primary
            concerns of cladding when stainless steel alloy is chosen are the following:

              1. Adherence to rebar substrate.
              2. Defects formed after bending.
              3. Uniform cladding thickness (typical value is 0.5 mm)
   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252