Page 278 - Challenges in Corrosion Costs Causes Consequences and Control(2015)
P. 278

256                                 CORROSION CONTROL AND PREVENTION

           TABLE 4.25  Total Annual Corrosion-Related Costs
           Agency                                                  Cost (Millions)
           US Army Corps of Engineers (maintenance @ 5%)               70.0
           US Public Ports – Corrosion-related maintenance             87.3
                         Corrosion-related replacements                95.0
           US Coast Guard – Lighthouse maintenance                     23.5
                         Replace steel ocean buoys                      2.0
                         Paint buoys                                    5.0
                         Replace river buoys                            2.0
                         Corrosion-related maintenance                  8.6
           Total                                                      $293.4


           steel support piles), bulkheads and retaining walls (steel sheet piling, steel-reinforced
           concrete elements, backside, and anchors on structures retaining dredged fill), and
           mooring structures and dams (steel gates, hinges, intake/discharge culverts, grates,
           and debris booms). Stationary navigational aids suffer from corrosion of support
           piles and steel-reinforced concrete pile caps. Floating steel buoys are also prone to
           corrosion (Table 4.25).
              Typical corrosion control methods for freshwater structures include coatings for
           atmospherically exposed steel and corrosion allowances for submerged and splash
           zone steel. Dielectric coatings are normally used for structural steel above water,
           while galvanizing is often used for railings, ladders, gates, and gratings. Copper con-
           taining steel alloys are sometimes utilized for structural elements and sheet pile walls.
           These alloys, which form a tenuous oxide film in the atmosphere, provide little protec-
           tion when buried or submerged. CP is occasionally used on submerged steel elements.
              Marine corrosion control methods also include coatings for atmospherically
           exposed steel elements and a corrosion allowance for submerged and splash zone
           steel structures. Specialty marine dielectric coatings are normally used for structural
           steel above and often below water.
              Although galvanizing is used for railings, ladders, gates, and gratings non-ferrous
           alloys provide better service in the aggressive saltwater marine conditions. Marine
           structures commonly use CP to control corrosion on submerged steel. CP is occa-
           sionally used on atmospherically exposed steel-reinforced concrete, in particular, in
           warm climates. The most cost-effective corrosion control on submerged and splash
           zone steel is achieved by using CP in conjunction with a heavy dielectric coating.
           Although corrosion allowances are often used for saltwater marine structures, they
           are not as helpful as in freshwater because the corrosion damage tends to be localized
           in the tidal zone (wet/dry cycling) and at the mud interface zone.
              Although corrosion is a significant issue within waterways and ports, funding for
           protection against corrosion is in short supply. Out of 276 lock chambers at 230 sites,
           only 191 sites with 237 lock chambers were funded in 1998 toward maintenance
           work. Neglected structures include single-pile navigational aids left in service until
           failure occurs. It is estimated that a new $15,000 navigational aid is necessary and
           the underwater pole needs to be removed.
   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283