Page 281 - Chemical process engineering design and economics
P. 281

260                                                      Chapter 5

            z 2 = 2.0 + 2.280 = 4.28  m (14.0  ft)

                From Table 5.4.1, the stripper-bottom pressure, pi=  1.65  bar  (23.9  psia), and
            the absorber-top pressure p 2 =  34.8  bar  (505  psia). Thus, we can calculate the  sec-
            ond  term in Equation  5.48.
                The  total-frictional  pressure  drop  in  the  system  is  the  sum  of  the  pressure
            drops caused by the piping and fittings,  control valve, interchange^ and air cooler.
            Estimates  of  these  loses  are  listed  in  Table  5.15.  Therefore,  the  total  frictional
            pressure drop in the system,

            E s + E D =  0.35  + 0.70 + 0.35 + 0.60 = 2.0 bar  (29.0  psi)

                Now,  substitute  numerical  values  into  Equation  5.48.  In  the  SI  system  of
                                                       5
                                                                   2
            units gc, is not needed.  Because one bar equals  IxlO  Pascals (N/m ), we have,
            after multiplying and dividing the first term in Equation  5.48  by kg,
                 9.8m   (4.28  -  24.0)  m-kg  (1.65 -34.8) bar  IxlO 5  N  1  m 3
                                                                2
                 1  s 2      1       kg         1          1   m -bar  974.0  kg


             2.0 bar  IxlO 5  N  1  m 3
                                                  3
                                       - = -3.391xl0  N-m/kg (-3.217 Btu/lb)
                           2
                1     1  m -bar  974.0kg
                     3
            ( -3.391xl0  J/kg)  ( -3.217 Btu/lb)
                         equals one Newton,  the  first  term has  units  of  N-m/kg,  as  does
            Because kg-m/s2
            the  other  terms.  The  negative  sign  means  that  the  work  is  done  on  the  system.
            Work done by a system is positive.
                   According  to Table 5.13,  the centrifugal pump efficiency  depends on the
            volumetric flow  rate.  From Table  5.13,  the pump efficiency  is 45 %,  Therefore,
            from Equation  5.49  the pump shaft power,

               mW      1   2.08 m 3  974kg  3391  J  1  min

                r|p   0.45      1  min  1m 3   1  kg  60  s

                     5
            = 2.544xl0  J/s (254  kW) (341.2 hp)
                Assuming  that a squirrel-cage  electric-motor  drive  for the pump is  selected,
            the  electric-motor  efficiency  is  determined by  interpolating between  100  and
            1,000  hp  (in  Table  5.9). An  acccurate  determination  of  the  motor  efficiency  re-




         Copyright © 2003 by Taylor & Francis Group LLC
   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286