Page 105 - Classification Parameter Estimation & State Estimation An Engg Approach Using MATLAB
P. 105

94                                             STATE ESTIMATION

            The equations are valid if the system is in the steady state, i.e.
                   2
                          2
            when   (i) ¼   (i þ 1) and E[x(i þ 1)x(i)] ¼ E[x(i)x(i   1)]. For this
                   x      x
                                                   2
                                              2
            situation the abbreviated notation       (1) is used. Furthermore,
                                              x    x
            r k denotes the autocorrelation between x(i) and x(i þ k). That is,
                                              2
            E[x(i)x(i þ k)] ¼ Cov[x(i)x(i þ k)] ¼   r k (only valid in the steady state).
                                              x
            See also Section 8.1.5 and Appendix C.2.
              Second order AR models are the time-discrete counterparts of second
            order differential equations describing physical processes that behave
            like a damped oscillator, e.g. a mass/spring/dampener system, a swinging
            pendulum, an electrical LCR-circuit, and so on. Figure 4.5 shows a
            realization of a second order AR process.
            Prediction

            Equation (4.13) is the basis for prediction. Suppose that at time i an
                              x
            unbiased estimate ^ x(i) is known together with the associated error
            covariance C e (i). The best predicted value (MMSE) of the state for ‘
            samples ahead of i is obtained by the recursive application of (4.13).
            The recursion starts with E[x(i)] ¼ ^ x(i) and terminates when
                                                 x
            E[x(i þ ‘)] is obtained. The covariance matrix C e (i)is a measure of
                                                                 x
            the magnitudes of the random fluctuations of x(i)around ^ x(i). As such
            it is also a measure of uncertainty. Therefore, the recursive usage of
            (4.13) applied to C e (i)gives C e (i þ ‘), i.e. the uncertainty of the
            prediction. With that, the recursive equations for the prediction
            become:

                                      x
                   ^ x xði þ ‘ þ 1Þ¼ Fði þ ‘Þ^ xði þ ‘Þþ Lði þ ‘Þuði þ ‘Þ
                                                                       ð4:22Þ
                                               T
                 C e ði þ ‘ þ 1Þ¼ Fði þ ‘ÞC e ði þ ‘ÞF ði þ ‘Þþ C w ði þ ‘Þ


                                                             d = 0.995
                     20
                                                             f = 0.1
                                       +1σ boundary          α = 1.61
                     10                                      β = – 0.99
                                                            σ  = 1
                                                             2
                                                             w
                      0                                    2  (∞) = 145.8
                                                          σ
                                                          x
                     –10
                                       –1σ boundary
                     –20
                        0             100      i     200
            Figure 4.5  Second order autoregressive process
   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110