Page 59 - Communication and Citizenship Journalism and the Public Sphere
P. 59

48 COMMUNICATION AND CITIZENSHIP

              One model is the centrally controlled market economy. Its underlying
            rationale is that  the terms of  and rules  by which competition is
            conducted  should be centrally  determined according to the  public
            interest. One example of this approach is provided by the British TV
            system, in which free-market competition is tempered in a number of
            ways. The largest  organization,  the BBC,  is  publicly owned and is
            expected to  set  quality standards since it  is run for  the public  good
            rather than private gain. The other main players in the system—ranging
            from a regionally based commercial network (Channel 3), a public trust
            corporation (Channel 4), local TV stations (cable TV) and a national
            commercial consortium (B Sky B)—are differentiated in organizational
            terms in order to promote choice. The principal TV channels are also
            funded mainly by different sources of revenue (licence fee, advertising
            and subscriptions) in order to avoid the uniformity induced by direct
            competition. And all  TV channels  are subject to content controls,
            though with varying degrees of stringency and policed in different ways.
              The full complexity of the system need not be described here. Built
            into its design are a number of central objectives:  quality defined in
            terms of  a  negotiation  between elite norms and  audience  ratings;
            diversity  defined in  terms  of a mix  of  different types of programme
            rather than of values; and political representation defined in terms of
            Westminster consensus rather than popular dissensus. However, these
            objectives can be changed and modifications can be made in the system
            to achieve this. Thus, a number of reforms have been proposed which
            would strengthen broadcasters’ autonomy from politicians, and extend
                                                          51
            the ideological and cultural range of programme output.  Indeed, one
            of the advantages of the centrally controlled approach is that systemic
            modifications can be effected relatively easily: the disadvantage is that
            this facility can be abused.
              An alternative approach  represented by the Dutch  broadcasting
            system takes the form of a mandated market economy. Both airtime and
            the use of publicly owned production facilities, with technical staff, are
            allocated in the Netherlands to different groups on the basis of the size
            of their  membership defined by the sale  of  their  programme guides.
            This results in a plurality of organizations from commercial groups like
            TROS to VARA (with close links to the Labour Party) and the NCRV
            (a  conservative, protestant organization), each  providing a
            comprehensive package of services. None of these groups, unlike the
            central news service, is required to adopt a bi-partisan approach. The
            intention  is to produce  a broadcasting  system that reflects  a wide
            spectrum  of  political opinion  and cultural values. But although the
   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64