Page 146 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 146

123                        The  Development  of  Normative  Structures

         ganized  around  a  state),  we  can  see  that  the  objections  mentioned
         above  are  pointless.  The  analysis  of  developmental  dynamics  is
         “materialist”  insofar  as  it  makes  reference  to  crisis-producing
         systems  problems  in  the  domain  of  production  and  reproduction;
         and  it  remains  “historically”  oriented  insofar  as  it  has  to  seek  the
         causes  of  evolutionary  changes  in  the  whole  range  of  those  con-
         tingent  circumstances  under  which  (a)  new  structures  ate  acquired
         in  the  individual  consciousness  and  transposed  into  structures  of
         world  views;  (b)  system  problems  arise,  which  overload  the
         steering  capacity  of  a  society;  (c)  the  institutional  embodiment  of
         new  rationality  structures  can  be  tried  and  stabilized;  and  (d)  the
         new  latitude  for  the  mobilization  of  resources  can  be  utilized.
         Only  after  rationalization  processes  (which  require  explanations
         that  are  both  historical  and  materialist)  have  been  historically
         completed  can  we  specify  the  patterns  of  development  for  the
         normative  structures  of  society.  These  developmental  logics  be-
         token  the  independence—and  to  this  extent  the  internal  history—
         of  the  spirit.



                                       Vv
         Finally  I  would  like  to  take  up  two  objections  that  might
         be  directed  against  my  declared  intention  to  take  historical
         materialism  as  my  starting  point.  In  the  first  place,  the  investiga-
         tion  of  the  capitalist  accumulation  process,  on  which  Marx  con-
         centrated  above  all,  hardly  plays  a  role  in  the  reformulation  of
         the  basic  assumptions  regarding  social  evolution.  Instead  there
         are  unmistakable  borrowings  from  structuralism  and  functional-
         ism.  Why  then  insist  any  longer  on  the  Marxist  theoretical  tradi-
         tion?  Furthermore,  why  should  one  pursue  historical  materialism
         at  all,  if  the  intention  of  orienting  action  would  be  better  served
         by  an  analysis  of  the  contemporary  formation  of  society?
           In  reference  to  the  first  question,  the  anatomy  of  bourgeois
         society  is  a  key  to  the  anatomy  of  premodern  societies;  to  this
         extent  the  analysis  of  capitalism  provides  an  excellent  entry  into
         the  theory  of  social  evolution.  The  general  concept  of  a  prin-
         ciple  of  social  organization  can  be  discerned  in  capitalist  societies
         because  there,  with  the  relation  of  wage  labor  and  capital,  the
   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151