Page 225 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 225

202                        Communication  and  Evolution  of  Society

         tematic  doctrines,  but  are  works  of  high  interpretive  art  that
         suggest  the  truth  of  classical  texts  through  interpretation,  rather
         than  by  grounding  it.
           Thus  certain  reductive  forms  of  Aristotelianism  have  a  better
         chance.  Withdrawing  the  theoretical  claim  of  practical  philoso-
         phy,  they  reduce  it  to  a  hermeneutics  of  everyday  conceptions  of
         the  good,  the  virtuous,  and  the  just  in  order  then  to  certify  that
         an  unchangeable  core  of  substantial  morality  is  preserved  in  the
         prudent  application  of  this  knowledge.  An  example  is  Hennis’
         use  of  Aristotle’s  To pics  for  political  science;  another  is  Gadamer’s
         interpretation  of  the  Nzcomachean  Ethics.

         Philosophical  ethics  is  in  the  same  situation  in  which  everyone  finds
         himself.  What  counts  as  right,  what  we  consent  or  object  to  in  judging
         ourselves  or  others,  follows  our  general  ideas  of  what  is  good  and
         just;  but  it  acquires  genuine  determinateness  only  in  the  concrete
         reality  of  the  case,  which  is  not  a  case  of  applying  a  general  rule....
         The  general,  the  typical,  which  alone  can  be  said  in  a  philosophical
         investigation  given  over  to  the  generality  of  the  concept,  is  not  essen-
         tially  different  from  what  guides  the  wholly  untheoretical,  average
         general  consciousness  of  norms  in  every  practical-moral  reflection.
         Above  all  it  is  not  different  from  it  insofar  as  it  includes  the  same
         task  of  application  to  given  circumstances  that  belongs  to  all  moral
         knowledge,  that  of  the  individual  no  less  than  that  of  the  statesman
         acting  in  everyone’s  behalf .5°
         But  if  philosophical  ethics  and  political  theory  can  know  nothing
         more  than  what  is  anyhow  contained  in  the  everyday  norm  con-
         sciousness  of  different  populations,  and  if  it  cannot  even  know
         this  in  a  different  way,  it  cannot  then  rationally  [begruéndet]
         distinguish  legitimate  from  illegitimate  domination.  Illegitimate
         domination  also  meets  with  consent,  else  it  would  not  be  able  to
         last.  (One  need  only  recall  those  days  in  which  great  masses  of
         people  came  together  in  the  squares  and  on  the  streets,  without
         being  pressured  to  do  so,  in  order  to  acclaim  an  empire,  a  people,
         and  a  leader—was  that  an  expression  of  anything  other  than  an
         untheoretical,  average  norm  consciousness?)  If,  on  the  other
         hand,  philosophical  ethics  and  political  theory  are  supposed  to
         disclose  the  moral  core  of  the  general  consciousness  and  to  re-
         construct  it  as  a  normative  concept  of  the  moral,  then  they  must
   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230