Page 89 - Communication and the Evolution of Society
P. 89

66                         Communication  and  Evolution  of  Society

         which,  in  a  given  context,  justify  an  interpersonal  relation  that  is
         to  be  performatively  established.  Finally,  he  claims  truthfulness
         for  the  intentions  expressed.  Of  course,  individual  validity  claims
         can  be  thematically  stressed,  whereby  the  truth  of  the  proposi-
         tional  content  comes  to  the  fore  in  the  cognitive  use  of  language,
         the  rightness  (or  appropriateness)  of  the  interpersonal  relation
         in  the  interactive,  and  the  truthfulness  of  the  speaker  in  the  ex-
         pressive.  But  in  every  instance  of  communicative  action  the  sys-
         tem  of  all  validity  claims  comes  into  play;  they  must  always  be
         raised  simultaneously,  although  they  cannot  all  be  thematic  at  the
         same  time.
            The  universality  of  the  validity  claims  inherent  in  the  structure
         of  speech  can  perhaps  be  elucidated  with  reference  to  the  system-
         atic  place  of  language.  Language  is  the  medium  through  which
         speakers  and  hearers  realize  certain  fundamental  demarcations.
         The  subject  demarcates  himself:  (1)  from  an  environment  that
         he  objectifies  in  the  third-person  attitude  of  an  observer;  (2)
         from  an  environment  that  he  conforms  to  or  deviates  from  in  the
         ego-alter  attitude  of  a  participant;  (3)  from  his  own  subjectivity
         that  he  expresses  or  conceals  in  a  first-person  attitude;  and  finally
         (4)  from  the  medium  of  language  itself.  For  these  domains  of
         reality  I  have  proposed  the  somewhat  arbitrarily  chosen  terms:
         external  nature,  society,  internal  nature,  and  language.  The  validity
         claims  unavoidably  implied  in  speech  oriented  to  reaching  under-
         standing  show  that  these  four  regions  must  always  simultaneously
         appear.  I  shall  characterize  the  way  in  which  these  regions  appear
         with  a  few  phenomenological  indications.
           By  external  nature  1  mean  the  objectivated  segment  of  reality
         that  the  adult  subject  is  able  (even  if  only  mediately)  to  perceive
         and  manipulate.  One  can,  of  course,  adopt  an  objectivating  at-
         titude  not  only  toward  inanimate  nature  but  toward  all  objects
         and  states  of  affairs  that  are  directly  or  indirectly  accessible  to
         sensory  experience.  Soczety  designates  that  symbolically  prestruc-
         tured  segment  of  reality  that  the  adult  subject  can  understand  in
         a  nonconformative  attitude,  that  is,  as  one  acting  communica-
         tively  (as  a  participant  in  a  system  of  communication).  Legiti-
         mate  interpersonal  relations  belong  here,  as  do  institutions,  tra-
         ditions,  cultural  values,  etc.  We  can  replace  this  conformative
   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94