Page 40 - Communication Commerce and Power The Political Economy of America and the Direct Broadcast Satellite
P. 40

28           Communication,  Commerce and Power

           mediating  role  in  the  ongoing  interaction  and modification  of con-
           ceptual systems and cultures. This way of conceptualizing information
           directs the analyst beyond assumptions that a predominantly one-way
           flow of information from a capitalist metropole inevitably will subject
           a  receiving  population  to  consumerist  desires  and  liberal  ideals.
           Instead,  what  this  alternative  suggests  is  that  a  concern  with  the
           capacity  of receiving  individuals  and  collectivities  to  interpret  and
           make  use  of information  constitutes  a  more  significant  analytical
           task.  This  is  not to  say  that such flows  are unimportant,  only  that,
           as the subject of study, culture must be understood as a problematic
           process rather than a  relatively straightforward power resource akin
           to economic wealth or military might.
             The importance of developing a precise and relatively sophisticated
           understanding of culture can be illustrated by contemporary problems
           involving capital flexibility and mobility developments involving new
           communication  and information  technologies  and reformed interna-
           tional legal and economic regimes (that is, the formation of the World
           Trade Organization). For the most part, analyses of this development
           lack precise theorizations of the state and its necessary role as a core
           structural  and  conceptual  mediator  of  such  historic  developments.
           While mostly commercial forces  are making significant strides in  the
           quest to  globalize  capitalism  and the  logic  of 'the free  market'  and
           other such  cultural  efforts,  an  essential  contradiction  has  emerged.
           While capital systemically tends to universalize itself,  the territorially
           and  historically  bound  nation  state  remains  the  core  arbiter of this
           process. As Stephen Gill observes,

             Whereas  capital  tends  towards  universality,  it  cannot  operate
             outside of or beyond the political context,  and involves  planning,
             legitimation,  and  the  use  of coercive  capacities  by  the  state.  This
             forms  the  key  substantive  problem  for  a  theory  of international
             relations,  at  least  as  seen  from  an  historical  materialist
             perspective.  In  this  context,  one  of the  main  tasks  of political
             economy  today is  to  understand and  theorise  the  possibilities  for
             the  transformation  of  these  dimensions  of world  order,  in  the
             context of consciousness, culture, and material life? 9

             Capitalism and capitalist social  relations,  over time,  must  expand
           and evolve.  However, because this does not take place in a historical
           vacuum,  contradiction  is  an  inherent condition  of the  process.  This
           involves  the  barriers  that  capital  must  overcome  in  the  form  of
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45