Page 116 - Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics
P. 116

A Variational Inequality Theory Chapter | 4 107


                           reduces here to

                                                  (∀v 2 > 0) : q 2 v 2 > 0,
                           which is equivalent to

                                                        q 2 > 0.
                                           3
                           Thus, for all q ∈ R such that q 2 > 0, problem VI(M,q, ) has at least one
                           solution.

                           4.11 DIAGONAL STABILITY AND SOLVABILITY CONDITIONS

                           The following result concerns the case (M, ) ∈ DS0 n .
                                                n
                           Corollary 10. Let K ⊂ R be defined by

                                                K = K 1 × K 2 × ··· × K n ,
                           where K i ⊂ R (1 ≤ i ≤ n) is a nonempty closed convex cone.
                              Let M ∈ R n×n . Suppose that there exists a positive diagonal matrix 	 such
                           that
                                                (∀x ∈ K) : Mx,	x ≥ 0.                 (4.76)
                                                             n
                            a) If B(M,K) ={0}, then for each q ∈ R , problem CP(M,q,K) has at least
                              one solution.
                            b) Suppose that B(M,K) 
= {0}. If there exists x 0 ∈ K such that
                                                                    T
                                         (∀v ∈ B(M,K),v 
= 0) : 	q − M 	x 0 ,v  > 0,  (4.77)

                              then problem CP(M,q,K) has at least one solution.
                            c) Moreover, if u 1 and u 2 are two solutions of problem CP(M,q,K), then

                                                     u 1 − u 2 ∈ N − (M).             (4.78)

                           Proof. From Proposition 13 we know that (M, ) ∈ DS0 n ⊂ P0 n .
                              Part a) is a direct consequence of Corollary 6.
                              Part b) Using Proposition 20, we see that, for all i ∈ N,i 
= 0, there exists
                                 n
                           u i ∈ R such that
                                             1
                                            ( I + M)u i + q,v − u i  ≥ 0, ∀v ∈ K.     (4.79)
                                             i
                           We claim that the sequence {u i }≡{u i ;i ∈ N\{0}} is bounded. Suppose on the
                           contrary that ||u i || → +∞ as i →+∞. Then, for i large enough, ||u i || 
= 0,
   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121