Page 93 - Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics
P. 93

84  Complementarity and Variational Inequalities in Electronics



                           This last relation, together with (4.39) and (4.40), implies that z ∈ B((1−t)M +
                           tI, ). This is a contradiction to our assumption requiring that (M, ) is AC n
                           well-posed since z 
= 0.
                              Thus, for R ≥ R 0 , (4.37) holds, and the Brouwer degree with respect to the
                           set
                                                          n
                                                D R ={x ∈ R :||x|| <R}
                           and 0 of the map (t,u)  à  u−H(t,u) is well defined for all t ∈[0,1]. Set R 1 =
                           ||P   (0)|| and let R> max{R 0 ,R 1 }. Using the homotopy invariance property
                           and the normalized property of the Brouwer degree, we obtain

                              deg(id R − P   (id R − (M. + q),D R ,0) = deg(id R − H(1,.),D R ,0)
                                              n
                                    n
                                                                       n
                                = deg(id R − H(0,.),D R ,0) = deg(id R − P   (0),D R ,0) = 1.
                                                                 n
                                         n
                           From the solution property of Brouwer degree we get that SOL(M,q, ) 
= ∅,
                           and the result follows.
                              The following result is a direct consequence of Theorem 4 and Proposi-
                           tion 17.

                                                                n
                           Corollary 3 (Spectral condition). Let   ∈  (R ;R∪{+∞}) and M ∈ R n×n .If
                                                 σ ∞ (M, ) ⊂]0,+∞[,

                                          n
                           then for each q ∈ R , problem VI(M,q, ) has at least one solution.
                           4.5 A BOUNDEDNESS CONDITION
                                   n
                           Let   : R → R ∪{+∞} be a proper convex and lower semicontinuous func-
                           tion with closed domain, and let M ∈ R n×n .Using Theorem 4 together with
                           Proposition 18, we get

                                         D( ) bounded =⇒ (M, ) ∈ AC n ⊂ Q n .

                                                 n
                           Corollary 4. Let   ∈  (R ;R ∪{+∞}) and M ∈ R n×n .If D( ) is bounded,
                           then
                                                              n
                                                  R(M, ) = R .
                           Example 42. Let
                                                    ⎛              ⎞
                                                       −1   1    0
                                                M = ⎝ 1     2   −1 ⎠
                                                                   ⎟
                                                    ⎜
                                                       0   −2   −1
   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98