Page 217 - Composition in Convergence The Impact of the New Media on Writing Assessment

184 SUBJECT INDEX

Rubric, xx, xxi, 49, 76, 93-94, 157, culturally salient text, 34-35, 46,
161 48
mundane text, 34-36, 38, 43, 45,
S 48, 51
transformed text, 39
Salon, 127 30-Year Rule, xxiii, xxvii, 139
Salon metaphor, 16-17 Time, 128
Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), xxiv, TOPIC/ICON, 102, 104-108, 126,
xxvii 160
Silence, 10-11 Transparency, 37-38, 42, 48-49
Silent partner, 72-73, 77 Trins, xxv
Situational literacy, 58 and proxes, xxv
Speech acts, 65-66 Trust, 10
Spectacle, 117-119
Structured Decision System (SDS), U
xxvi
Student resistance, 68 Underlife, 42-44, 58
Synthesia, 121 University of Nebraska, 68-69, 71
Syncretics, 169-170
V
T
Validity, 13, 20, 49, 87-115
Technology, x, xi, xv, xix, xxii, xxvii, concurrent validity, xxvi, 88, 113
xxx, 4, 15, 48, 52-54, 56, construct validity, xxvi, 88, 113
61-62, 64, 94, 116, 125, face validity, xxvi, 88, 113
140, 146, 169 predictive validity, xxvi, 49, 88
and change, xxii, xxix, 125-127, surface validity, xx, 49, 88
159 Variable errors, 90-91
computer, ix, x, 163, 166 Visibility, 38, 42-43, 49
influence of, xvi, xxvii, 84, 162 Visual rhetoric, 18, 20, 42-43, 45,
local issues and, xvi, 15, 142, 51, 94, 113, 139, 146
146-147
promise and paradox, xxx, xxxi
societal factors and, xvi, 84, W
127-131, 141-142, 154,
162 WebCT, xix, 75, 97, 148
tensions with, xvi, 84, 155 Web logs, 1, 18, 31, 57, 60, 64-65
Techne, 26, 40 Writing,
Technomyopia, xxi, xxxiii as a communicative act, 2-3, 25
Technophobia, xxxiii, 111 as a private exercise, 2
Temporality, 65
Test measurement, 89, 95, 113, 130 Y
Text, 28-31, 34-35, 46-48, 51,
55-56. 72-73, 79, 94-95
aesthetically valued text, 34-35, 48 YOYOW, 65