Page 237 - Compression Machinery for Oil and Gas
P. 237

226 SECTION    II Types of Equipment


            viscous damper conditions for engines (if applicable). The resultant compressor
            or engine cylinder excitation is applied to the train during the forced response
            stress analysis. With trains involving motors, slip and/or VFD frequencies are
            normally evaluated in addition to mechanical orders of running speed.
               During the forced response calculations, stress concentration factors (SCFs)
            are developed to account for keyways, major diameter changes, fillet radii, etc.
            based on shaft geometry provided by the equipment manufacturers and/or expe-
            rience with similar machines. The resultant intensified stress and/or dynamic
            torques developed at each station in the model are then compared against allow-
            able values (provided by the OEM or independently developed) to determine
            acceptability.
               A torsional analyst will typically evaluate the provided train configuration
            and make recommendations for modifications, if necessary, to shift the calcu-
            lated torsional critical speeds or otherwise improve the damage tolerance of the
            shafting.


            Torsional Mass Elastic Models
            Torsional models are normally prepared by lumping major system masses (e.g.,
            motor cores, piston/rod inertias, flywheels, etc.) and connecting these with tor-
            sional stiffness values to represent the shafting and couplings. It is important to
            maintain sufficient fidelity in the model to accurately reflect the dynamically
            important modes. It is also prudent to lump the model in such a way as to main-
            tain constant diameters within each interconnecting stiffness value when prac-
            tical, thereby limiting the effects of stress concentration to the parts of the
            shafting that will experience it. This latter practice avoids overly conservative
            forced response stress and cumulative fatigue results.
               For typical solid shafting, the stiffness of the shaft may be estimated by
            using the following formula:
                                            ∗  ∗  4  ∗
                                K ¼ JG=L ¼ π G D = 32 Lð  Þ
               Likewise, the following formula may be used to estimate the polar mass
            moment of inertia for solid cylinders or discs:
                                             ∗ ∗ ∗
                                     Ip ¼ π=32 ρ L D 4
               In many cases, torsional stiffness and inertia information is available from
            the OEM involved (EG: coupling stiffness, hub inertias, motor core inertia,
            reciprocating throw inertias, etc.). In most cases, these values are not considered
            controversial. Although calculating torsional stiffness values for the webs of
            reciprocating machines can be challenging for some geometries, several
            resources exist to provide guidance in mass elastic model generation, including
            the book by W. Ker Wilson entitled “Practical Solution of Torsional Vibration
            Problems” [8]. If necessary, solid models and/or FEA calculations may be uti-
            lized to confirm or estimate these values.
   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242