Page 91 - Computational Retinal Image Analysis
P. 91

5  Optic disc and fovea detection  83




                  5  Optic disc and fovea detection

                  There have been many algorithms developed over the last 30 years for automatically
                  detecting the optic disc and fovea in retinal fundus photography. The reasons for do-
                  ing so have been stated above and this is generally a first image processing step in a
                  pipeline of algorithms, whether they be for automatic or semiautomatic systems. In
                  semiautomatic systems, where a human can intervene after certain processing steps
                  and make changes, the consequences of incorrectly identifying the OD and fovea are
                  minor. It would simply take a little extra time for the user to make the correction and
                  continue. In automatic systems, the wrongly detected OD or fovea can affect the ac-
                  curacy of future algorithms, possibly impacting disease diagnosis.
                     Algorithms for the detection of the optic disc vary widely, but the approaches
                  can generally be narrowed into subsets based on the type of information they use to
                  make their OD prediction. These subsets include (1) detecting the OD as the brightest
                  region in the image, (2) Detecting the OD as the convergence of the retinal vascu-
                  lature, (3) Detecting the OD through template matching and (4) Detecting the OD
                  through supervised methods. The next section will give examples of methods de-
                  veloped using information from these subsets and show the ways researchers have
                  combined this information to make robust algorithms that can detect the OD in the
                  presence of disease, low image quality or even when the OD is not present in the
                  image. The methods highlighted in this chapter were chosen to cover a large period
                  of time (20 years) and show how popular early methods were built upon to address
                  inherent shortcomings. To find in-depth literature reviews on this topic, please see
                  [18, 19]. There are fewer methods available for fovea detection. A priori knowledge,
                  such as eye side and field of view, can constrain the problem and make detection
                  much easier. When available in the following OD methods, fovea detection is also
                  highlighted.

                  5.1  Automated localization of the optic disc, fovea, and retinal
                  blood vessels from digital color fundus images (Sinthanayothin
                  et al., 1999 [20])
                  This method was chosen as the starting point for this review because it is one of
                  the earliest papers in this area and is subsequently very highly cited. The authors
                  developed methods to detect all the retinal landmarks and shows how fairly simple
                  methods were able to detect both the OD and fovea with high accuracy. First, the
                  images were preprocessed to enhance local contrast. The images were converted
                  from the RGB color space to the intensity hue saturation space. This separates the
                  intensity and color information so that the contrast can be adjusted without affecting
                  perceived color. A variance image is then created by calculating the mean variance
                  within 81 × 81 pixels ROI’s within the main image, with the maximum value being
                  the found OD. The reasoning being that the bright OD combined with the dark ves-
                  sels and OD border will provide the maximum variance within a sub-image roughly
   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96