Page 35 - Contemporary Cultural Theory
P. 35

CULTURALISM

            “Teutonic” philology: neither Raleigh nor Verall’s successor at
            Cambridge, Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch, was slow to identify the
            potentially sinister implications of too enthusiastic an interest in German
            culture.
              English Literature’s contribution to post-war reconstruction, the
            1921 Newbolt Report on the teaching of English, proposed to establish
            the study of English language and literature at the centre of a national
            education in national consciousness. The Newbolt Committee’s vision
            of English Literature as the cement of national unity found enthusiastic
            echo at Cambridge (Quiller-Couch served as a member of the
            Committee), but never really gained favour at Oxford, where an older,
                                        16
            pluralist, dilettantism held sway.  Thus it was Cambridge, rather
            than Oxford, which would witness both the “revolution in English
            studies”, and the appearance of “Leavisism”, a new literary-critical
            doctrine which would, in turn, decisively shape the character of the
            profession of English teaching in the years after the Second World
            War. English Literature had justified itself as a discipline not in terms
            of the particular class interests of the Arnoldian remnant, but rather
            the contribution that sweetness and light might make to the construction
            of a unitary Anglo-British national culture. It was thus inextricably
            connected to the development of modern English nationalism, and to
            that of its wider imperial extension, greater British imperial nationalism.
            In retrospect, it becomes difficult to avoid the speculation that many
            of those inspired both by Newbolt’s Association and by his discipline
            must have eventually ended their lives in some corner of a foreign
            field that would be forever “English”.


                                     T.S.Eliot

            If Arnold is the central 19th century figure in the development of the
            culturalist tradition, then the equivalent status for the period since
            the First World War, at least insofar as the general intellectual culture
            is concerned as distinct from the more specialist rituals of academic
            professionalism, is almost certainly that of the poet, T.S.Eliot. Eliot
            was born and brought up in the United States, and became English
            only by an act of conversion, which came to embrace not only British
            naturalization but also High Tory politics, High Anglican religion
            and High Royalist monarchism. A deeply learned man, his prose


                                       26
   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40