Page 197 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 197

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 188





                                      Contemporary Cultural Theory



                   truth” of postmodernism’ (p. 49). A fully contemporary version
                   of what the young Lukács had meant by class consciousness
                   would therefore need to apprehend precisely this moment of
                   truth. But in a culture so commodified, so subject to the logic
                   of the simulacrum, what becomes of class consciousness? At one
                   level, the answer is obvious. If its emergence requires that the real-
                   ities of class structure become representable, then the widening
                   rift between sign and referent will tend to produce formidable
                   structural inhibitors to its development: ‘For a society that wants
                   to forget about class...reification...is very functional indeed’
                   (p. 315).
                      Since the emergence of class consciousness has been struc-
                   turally pre-empted, the capacity to map or model ‘the system’
                   either disappears altogether or must temporarily lie elsewhere.
                   That elsewhere is located somewhere between critical theory and
                   a hypothetically postmodern political art. For this was Jameson’s
                   solution to the temporary absence of class consciousness from
                   postmodern late capitalism: to posit the need for an ‘aesthetic of
                   cognitive mapping’, through which to learn how to represent ‘the
                   truth of postmodernism—that is... the world space of multi-
                   national capital’ and so ‘again begin to grasp our positioning as
                   individual and collective subjects’ (Jameson, 1991, p. 54). Cog-
                   nitive mapping, he explained, is in reality a ‘code word’ for class
                   consciousness ‘of a new and hitherto undreamed of kind’,
                   which has not yet come into being. Hence the sense of his
                   own work as the anticipation in theory of what might eventually
                   become class consciousness—as an experiment ‘to see whether
                   by systematizing something that is resolutely unsystematic, and
                   historicizing something that is resolutely ahistorical, one couldn’t
                   outflank it and force a historical way at least of thinking about
                   that’ (p. 418).



                   Jameson and Adorno
                   At this point, Adorno’s special significance for Jameson becomes
                   apparent. For despite its American idiom, Jameson’s rhetorical
                   and theoretical strategy is clearly reminiscent of the Frankfurt
                   School. Adorno and Horkheimer had initially imagined their

                                               188
   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202