Page 202 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 202

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 193





                                      Postmodernism and cultural theory



                     the postmodern, there is no doubting the critical edge to that
                     fascination, as registered at the very least in the distance
                     between the appalled theorist and the ‘extraordinarily demoral-
                     izing and depressing... new global space’ he sought to theorise
                     (Jameson, 1991, p. 49). Nor was there much doubting the critical
                     vantage point from which this theorising had been mounted. One
                     available response to the postmodernist insistence on the discon-
                     nectedness of social position and cultural identity is to treat it,
                     not as an ontological or epistemological proposition, but as
                     pertaining to the period culture of a specifically postmodern stage
                     in human history. As Huyssen has it: ‘the waning of historical
                     consciousness is itself a historically explainable phenomenon’
                     (Huyssen, 1995, p. 9).
                       This is exactly the view canvassed by Jameson. Hence the
                     paradox that the work of this apparently postmodern thinker
                     should have acquired an increasingly Adornian cast, as a kind
                     of Kulturpessimismus for the 1990s. The paradox is more apparent
                     than real, however, for if Jameson has been ready to concede
                     the theoretical value of postmodernism and post-structuralism,
                     it was only ever on the condition that critical theory ‘must nec-
                     essarily become true again when the dreary realities of
                     exploitation... and the resistance to it in the form of class struggle
                     . . . slowly reassert themselves’ (Jameson, 1988a, p. 208). In the
                     absence of an effective socialist movement, there was therefore
                     an almost inescapable logic in Jameson’s resort to Adorno and
                     Horkheimer ‘to restore the sense of something grim and impend-
                     ing within the polluted sunshine of the shopping mall’ (Jameson,
                     1990, p. 248). This seems to us at least as honourably political a
                     response to the postmodern condition as anything in Sokal and
                     Bricmont.


                     The twin faces of postmodernism
                     Which takes us to the more general question of the politics of post-
                     modernism. Bauman observes that the postmodern condition has
                     two faces. This sense of Janus as the presiding god of post-
                     modernity has been widespread in the postmodern debate,
                     especially in discussions of cultural politics. Huyssen, for

                                                 193
   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207