Page 203 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 203

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 194





                                      Contemporary Cultural Theory



                   example, argued that postmodernist culture was at once both
                   incorporated and oppositional, commodified and subversive, and
                   concluded by invoking a ‘postmodernism of resistance’ against
                   the ‘postmodernism of the “anything goes” variety’ (Huyssen,
                   1988, p. 220). Interestingly, he also noted how high modernism
                   had established itself through an opposition to mass culture,
                   which coded the latter ‘as feminine and inferior’ (p. 62). Hence
                   feminism’s contribution to an emergently postmodern ‘prob-
                   lematic of “otherness”’ (p. 219). Writing from a more explicitly
                   feminist perspective, Ann Kaplan described these twin faces of
                   postmodernism as, respectively, the ‘commercial’ and the
                   ‘utopian’ (Kaplan, 1988, p. 4). In the first, the capitalist mass
                   market deconstructed the binary opposition between elite and
                   popular cultures; in the second, postmodern feminism that
                   between masculinity and femininity. These vastly differing
                   conceptions of the postmodern had coexisted in a single cultural
                   space, she argued, because both responded to the cultural situ-
                   ation of the 1960s (p. 5).



                   Postmodernism and posthumanism
                   The Janus trope is evident, too, in the debates over posthuman-
                   ism. For Lash is by no means alone in imagining the global
                   information culture as potentially ‘posthuman’. During the
                   second half of the twentieth century, structuralist and post-
                   structuralist semiologies and a range of new technologies for
                   re-embodiment and dis-embodiment combined so as to radically
                   decentre earlier humanist notions of the human. As Ihab Hassan
                   observed a quarter of a century ago: ‘five hundred years of
                   humanism may be coming to an end, as humanism transforms
                   itself into something that we must helplessly call posthumanism’
                   (Hassan, 1977, p. 212). This has become an increasingly pressing
                   theme in recent speculation located in the various theoretical
                   spaces between cyberpunk and cyborgs, virtual reality and the
                   Internet. The best-known of these is still  Simians, Cyborgs and
                   Women by Donna Haraway, Professor of History of Conscious-
                   ness at the University of California at Santa Cruz. Claiming that
                   we already live in a posthuman era, where machine and

                                               194
   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208