Page 204 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 204

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 195





                                      Postmodernism and cultural theory



                     organism are already hybridised, she posited the ‘cyborg’ as a
                     ‘fiction mapping our social and bodily reality and as an imagi-
                     native resource’ (Haraway, 1991, p. 150). ‘The cyborg is a kind of
                     disassembled and reassembled, postmodern collective and
                     personal self’, she argued: ‘This is the self feminists must code’
                     (p. 163). The feminist potential of such cyborg imagery should
                     be readily apparent: ‘The cyborg is a creature in a post-gender
                     world’, she wrote; its ‘imagery can suggest a way out of the maze
                     of dualisms in which we have explained our bodies and our tools
                     to ourselves’ (pp. 150, 181).
                       Like Huyssen and Kaplan, Haraway also noted the twin faces
                     of posthumanism. ‘From one perspective’, she wrote, ‘a cyborg
                     world is about the final imposition of a grid of control on the
                     planet,... about the final appropriation of women’s bodies in a
                     masculinist orgy of war’. But from another, she continued, it
                     ‘might be about lived social and bodily realities in which people
                     are not afraid of their joint kinship with animals and machines,
                     not afraid of permanently partial identities and contradictory
                     standpoints’. No doubt she was right to conclude that ‘each
                     reveals both possibilities and dominations unimaginable from
                     the other’ (p. 154). And it is difficult not to be affected by her
                     enthusiasm for the positive potential of science and technology.
                     As she writes elsewhere: ‘to “press enter” is not a fatal error, but
                     an inescapable possibility for changing maps of the world . . . It’s
                     not a “happy ending” we need, but a non-ending’ (Haraway,
                     1992, p. 327). Her alternative perspectives are not simply logical
                     possibilities, however; they are also socio-historical potentials, the
                     effectivity of which is conditioned by the balance of historical
                     probabilities and social forces. And at this level, in the short term
                     at least, endings do sometimes happen and they are as likely to
                     be unhappy as happy.



                     Postmodernism and the collapse of traditional humanism
                     The coexistence of these twin faces of postmodernism is not
                     so much a feature of the 1960s in particular as of the postwar
                     period in general. It arose, moreover, as the effect of an absence
                     rather than a presence. Where critical theorists have detected

                                                 195
   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209