Page 62 - Contemporary Cultural Theory 3rd edition
P. 62

ContCultural Theory Text Pages  4/4/03  1:42 PM  Page 53





                            Literature and society: from culturalism to cultural materialism



                     What was at issue, he argued, was the ‘move toward “author-
                     itarian populism”—an exceptional form of the capitalist state
                     which... has been able to construct around itself an active
                     popular consent’ (Hall, 1983, pp. 22–3). Strongly influenced by
                     the ‘post-Marxism’ of Ernesto Laclau and Chantal Mouffe
                     (Laclau & Mouffe, 1985; Laclau & Mouffe, 1987), whose work he
                     would describe as ‘seminal’ and ‘extraordinarily rich’ (Grossberg,
                     1996, p. 145), Hall’s central contention was that this popular
                     consent had been secured through the effective ‘articulation’ of
                     Thatcherism with key elements in traditional working-class
                     culture. According to Hall, Thatcherism operated directly ‘on
                     popular elements in the traditional philosophies and practical
                     ideologies of the  dominated classes’. This was possible, he
                     explained, because such elements ‘have no intrinsic, necessary or
                     fixed class meaning’ and can therefore be recomposed in new
                     ways, so as ‘to construct the people into a populist political
                     subject:  with, not against, the power bloc’ (Hall, 1983, p. 30).
                     In subsequent reformulations, Hall sought to ‘disarticulate’ the
                     politics of the  Anglo-American New Right from economic
                     and cultural postmodernity: Thatcherism, he insisted, ‘represents
                     . . . an attempt...to  harness and bend to its political project
                     circumstances... which do not necessarily have a “New Right”
                     political agenda inscribed in them’ (Hall, 1989, pp. 116–17).
                       No doubt Hall was right to insist that the Left could neither
                     revive nor survive if ‘wholly cut off from the landscapes of
                     popular pleasures, however contradictory and “commodified”’
                     (pp. 128–9). But some critical distance, some continuing sense of
                     the ‘classed’ nature of capitalism, was surely necessary were the
                     Left to go on being left. There were good empirical reasons,
                     moreover, to treat Hall’s approach with some caution. Alternative
                     explanations were available: Williams himself had suggested that
                     the scale of Conservative electoral victory was more plausibly
                     explained by the ‘first-past-the-post’ electoral system than by a
                     successfully Thatcherite ideological mobilisation (Williams, 1989,
                     p. 163); he had shown that pro-Labour loyalties persisted among
                     union members, the unemployed and manual workers (Williams,
                     1983, pp. 156–7); and that the fall in the Labour vote was as much
                     a consequence of the splits in the Party as of any direct transfer

                                                 53
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67