Page 139 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 139

Genetic fuzzy logic based system for arrhythmia classification  123


              Table 7 Performances of the FLC before genetic optimization.
              S              TP    TN    FP    FN    ACC (%)   Se (%)   Sp (%)
              NSR            31    10    1     6     85.416    83.783    90.909
              LBBB           3     43    1     1     95.833    75.000    97.729
              RBBB           3     42    1     2     93.750    60.000    97.674
              PVC            1     42    3     2     89.583    33.333    93.333
              P              0     40    4     4     83.333    0.000     90.909
              Average ACC                            89.583



              Table 8 Performances of the FLC after the genetic optimization.
              S              TP    TN    FP    FN    ACC (%)   Se (%)   Sp (%)
              NSR            32    16    0     0     99.999    99.999    99.999
              LBBB           4     31    0     1     97.058    66.666    99.999
              RBBB           4     32    0     0     99.999    99.999    99.999
              PVC            2     31    2     1     94.117    50.000    96.875
              P              2     31    2     1     94.117    50.000    96.875
              Average ACC                            97.054


              Tables 7 and 8 summarize the FLC performances achieved before and after
              the genetic optimization, respectively. In each table, bold values indicate the
              highest and lowest class performances, as well as the average ACC.
                 On one hand, by referring to Table 7, we deduce that the configured
              FLC reaches an acceptable average accuracy (ACC¼89.583%). Globally,
              it achieves good results for classifying four heartbeats types (NSR, PVC,
              LBBB and RBBB). In addition, we found that the maximum accuracy
              (ACC¼95.833%) is obtained by classifying (LBBB) heartbeats with signif-
              icant sensitivity (Se¼75%) and specificity (Sp¼97.72%). However, the
              performances are less efficient (ACC¼83.333%, Se¼0%, Sp¼90.90%)
              by evaluating the (P) heartbeats. This indicates that the FLC has not classified
              any examples with arrhythmia (P). We also noticed that only 33.33% of the
              examples with arrhythmia (PVC) are correctly classified.
                 On the other hand, by referring to Table 8, we deduce that after applying
              the genetic optimization the FLC reaches a more accurate average accuracy
              (ACC¼97.054%). In fact, the optimized FLC achieves good results (ACC,
              Se, Sp¼99.999%) for classifying (NSR and RBBB) heartbeats. However,
              the obtained performances for the classification of the (P and PVC) arrhyth-
              mias are improved by using the optimized parameters (ACC¼94.117,
              Se¼50% and Sp¼96.875). However, they are still less accurate than the
              other heartbeat classes (NSR, LBBB and RBBB).
   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144