Page 277 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 277

Exoskeletons in upper limb rehabilitation  249


              tradeoff of limited ROM and complex design. Apart from the shoulder
              joint, misalignment may occur at the elbow and wrist joints (Rocon
              et al., 2008). Gunasekara et al. (2015) in their 6-REXOS exoskeleton has
              proposed two additional DOFs to compensate for elbow and wrist joint mis-
              alignment. An exoskeleton that has a cable-driven parallel mechanism, such
              as CAREX-7 (Cui et al., 2017), is inherently aligned and has great kinematic
              matching with humans. A review on cable-driven exoskeletons was recently
              published (Sanjuan et al., 2020). Li et al. (2019) made an exoskeleton com-
              prised of a novel mechanism that makes the exoskeleton self-aligning during
              its maneuver (Li et al., 2019). Furthermore, to align axes of an exoskeleton’s
              joint for upper arm internal/external rotation and forearm pronation/supi-
              nation is a challenging task as those axes are longitudinal axes of correspond-
              ing limb segments; therefore, placing motors along those axes is impossible.
              Perry et al. (2007) used curve rail bearing to provide rotational motion along
              the upper arm and forearm. Rahman et al. (2014) developed an innovative
              gear mechanism where motion is transmitted from an antibacklash gear
              (mounted on a motor shaft) to an open-type, custom-made meshing ring
              gear attached rigidly to the upper arm cup. In harmony robot, a parallelo-
              gram mechanism along with belt and pulley drive has been used to produce
              forearm pronation/supination (Kim and Deshpande, 2017). Though pro-
              gress has been made, designing an exoskeleton that is ergonomic with full
              natural ROM and capable of evading misalignment in joints is still a great
              challenge for researchers. To provide better HEI, kinematic matching
              between the exoskeleton and the human is a must in upper limb rehabilita-
              tive exoskeletons.



              Actuation
              Actuators are the main elements that contribute more to exoskeleton weight
              than any other elements. Various kind of actuators have been used in upper
              limb exoskeletons, such as electric actuators (Kiguchi et al., 2008; Nef et al.,
              2009a; Gopura et al., 2009; Rahman et al., 2014; Cui et al., 2017; Xiao et al.,
              2018; Islam et al., 2019), pneumatic actuators (Song et al., 2007; Sutapun
              and Sangveraphunsiri, 2015; Balasubramanian et al., 2008), hydraulic actu-
              ators (Stienen et al., 2009; Otten et al., 2015; Liu et al., 2016), pneumatic
              muscle actuators (Tsagarakis and Caldwell, 2003; Tu et al., 2017; Irshaidat
              et al., 2019; Liu et al., 2020), and series elastic actuators (Kim and Desh-
              pande, 2017). In electrical actuation, DC brushed, DC brushless, and servo-
              motors are frequently used to generate required joint torques in exoskeleton.
   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282