Page 47 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 47

34    Control theory in biomedical engineering


          The pacemaker is placed in the human body in order to control heart
          rhythms (Miller et al., 2015; Cox et al., 2018).
             Further, a wearable artificial prosthetic device should be perceived by the
          patient as a natural body part. The main goal of artificial prosthetics is to rep-
          licate sensory-motor capabilities of the natural body parts (Novak and
          Riener, 2015). The loss of a body affects an individual’s ability to interact
          with their environment. Thus, several researchers have attempted to con-
          struct artificial prosthetics in order to duplicate the function of human limbs.
          The main application of artificial prosthetic devices is the wearable hand
          prosthetic (Arjun et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2016; Nemoto et al., 2018).



          5 Conclusion
          Mathematical modeling and the theory of control applied to physiological
          systems contribute to understanding and maintaining control of the pro-
          cesses of the human body. In this chapter, we reviewed the most used math-
          ematical approaches and models in physiology. These approaches and
          models are supported by structural and practical identifiability as necessary
          tools for a comprehensive modeling. We also reviewed the dynamics of
          the chaos that arises in several physiological processes and presented many
          examples. As the natural and autonomous control process for the human
          body is at the heart of future medicine, we provided comprehensive info
          on this concept as well as different examples of homeostasis via fundamental
          principles of feedback control and different control approaches. Finally, we
          outlined a number of challenges and future trends, including biofeedback
          control and design and implementation of artificial organs.



          References
          Abdolrazaghi, M., Navidbakhsh, M., Hassani, K., 2010. Mathematical modelling and elec-
             trical analog equivalent of the human cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc. Eng. 10 (2),
             45–51.
          Adam, J., Bellomo, N., 2012. A Survey of Models for Tumor-Immune System Dynamics.
             Springer Science & Business Media.
          Aidley, D.J., 1998. The Physiology of Excitable Cells. Cambridge University Press,
             Cambridge, UK.
          Ajmera, I., et al., 2013. The impact of mathematical modeling on the understanding of dia-
             betes and related complications. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst. Pharmacol. 2 (7), e54.
          Allali, K., Harroudi, S., Torres, D.F.M., 2018. Analysis and optimal control of an intracellular
             delayed HIV model with CTL immune response. Math. Comput. Sci. 12 (2), 111–127.
          Allman, E., Rhodes, J., 2004. Mathematical Models in Biology. An Introduction. Cambridge
             University Press, Cambridge, UK.
   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52