Page 83 - Control Theory in Biomedical Engineering
P. 83

70    Control theory in biomedical engineering


          during the meal consumption periods are presented. Subsequently, the
          PMM-AP control formulation is presented.

          3.1 Adaptive glycemic and plasma insulin risk indexes

          An adaptive glycemic risk index (GRI) is used to determine the weighting
          matrix for penalizing the deviations of the controlled variables (outputs)
          from their nominal set-point values (Hajizadeh et al., 2019b, c). The
          GRI asymmetrically increases the set-point tracking weight when outputs
          diverge from the target range. Since hypoglycemic events have serious
          short-term implications, the set-point penalty increases rapidly in response
          to hypoglycemic excursions and more gradually in hyperglycemic excur-
          sions. A plasma insulin risk index (PIRI) is defined to manipulate the
          weighting matrix for penalizing the amount of input actuation (aggressive-
          ness of insulin dosing) depending on the estimated PIC, thus suppressing the
          infusion rate if sufficient insulin is present in the bloodstream (Hajizadeh
          et al., 2019b, c). As it is impractical to directly consider the estimates of
          the PIC to define parameters of the AL-MPC due to the variability among
          subjects, the normalized value of the PIC is employed, which eliminates the
          dependency of the PIC estimates to a particular subject by standardizing with
          the known patient-specific basal PIC value.

          3.2 Plasma insulin concentration bounds

          In the proposed AL-MPC, the estimated future PIC is dynamically bounded
          depending on the value of the CGM measurements. For instance, if the
          CGM values are elevated, the bounds on the PIC are increased to ensure
          sufficient insulin is administered to regulate the glucose concentration. Fur-
          thermore, the PIC bounds also constrain the search space in the optimization
          problem, thus improving the computational tractability of the proposed
          AL-MPC. The PIC bounds are determined based on the CGM measure-
          ments as X PIC :¼ðP fasting + P meal ÞX yðÞ, where X PIC defines the lower
                                            k
          and upper bounds and a desired target for the normalized PIC through
          the predicted CGM. P meal is a parameter that modifies the PIC bounds
          when there is a rapid increase in CGM values. P fasting is a patient-specific
          parameter that defines the controller aggressiveness/conservativeness during
          the fasting period. These bounds and the reference target for the normalized
          PIC are defined as a function of the CGM value, and the AL-MPC solution
          should satisfy the PIC constraints while maintaining the PIC close to the
          desired value. The nominal PIC bounds can be determined by multiplying
   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88