Page 60 - Critical and Cultural Theory
P. 60

REPRESENTATION
    particular,  do  not  reflect  the  reality  of  space  itself  but  rather
    cultural  perceptions  of it. 5
      The  idea  that  the  world  may  be objectively perceived  and  repre-
    sented  by  establishing  one  correct  way  of  seeing  has  recently  been
    questioned  by  digital  vision.  Electronic  technology  often  fosters
    multi-perspectivalism:  computers  frequently employ  two  cameras,
    which  see differently  just  as  human  eyes  do.  The  displacement  of
     the  single eye, moreover,  goes  hand  in hand  with the  displacement
     of  the  T.  Indeed,  the  digital  representation  of the  T  emphasizes
     its  shifting  and  wandering  nature.  According  to  Sean  Cubitt,  the
     subject  T  has  two  digital  correlatives:  'the  blinking cursor/inser-
     tion  point  that  stands  just  ahead  of  every  last  letter'  and  the
     'nomadic  I-bar/arrow  and  its  various  metamorphoses  -  the
     pointer-tool'.  Both  of  these  functions  metaphorically  underscore
     the  rootless  status  of  the  T:  'The  cursor  as  perpetual  tourist
     meanders  through  a  landscape  which  is  always  foreign'  and  the
     pointer  'circulates',  seeking  'a  home  from  which  its  very  freedom
     has exiled it'.  Moreover,  the movements of the digital T  are  repre-
     sented  by  a  blind  toy: a  mouse  that  'runs  its  errands  tail-first'
     (Cubitt  1998:  88-91).
       The  interplay  of  representation  and  ideology  described  in
     relation  to  perspectivalism is further  borne  out  by  the  fact  that  all
     cultures  and  traditions  of  thought  have  inevitably  relied  upon
     symbolic  and  mythical constructs  which  people  have  (implicitly or
     explicitly)  been  required  to  assimilate  and  internalize.  Even
     cultural  trends  and  philosophical  movements  apparently
     committed  to  dismantling  those  constructs  have  themselves
     depended  on  imaginary  representations  for  the  sake  of  advancing
     particular  ideological  agendas.  This  is  one  of  the  main  arguments
     pursued  by Theodor  Adorno  and  Max  Horkheimer  in  Dialectic  of
     Enlightenment  (1944).  Here  the  two  critics  propose  that  although
     the  objective  of  the  Enlightenment  was,  ostensibly,  to  liberate
     people  from  irrational  fears  and  illusions nurtured  by  mythology
     and  its  representations,  it  ultimately  proved  analogous  to  myth
     itself.  The  Enlightenment  aspired  to  transcend  explanations  of  life
     and  the  universe  which  it  regarded  as  fictitious,  in  order  to  attain
     to  putatively  deeper  and  higher  truths.  However,  it  was  itself
     caught  up  in  a chain  of  ideological  mystifications. No  sooner  is an


     5
     I»-  See Part III, Chapter  3, 'Space'.
                                 43
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65