Page 61 - Critical and Cultural Theory
P. 61

LANGUAGE AND INTERPRETATION
    explanation  provided  than  it  solidifies  into  a  myth,  a  dogmatic
    belief  that  people  are  expected  to  leave  unexamined.  Classical
    mythology  claimed  superiority  over  magic  by presenting  itself  as  a
    coherent  and  universal  representation  of  the  workings  of  the
    cosmos and  of the relationship  between  the human  and  the divine.
    Yet,  its somewhat  dogmatic  claims  to  truth  and  universality  made
    it vulnerable to criticism.
      Adorno and  Horkheimer  argue  that  the supplanting of magic by
    Classical  mythology  constitutes  an  attempt  to  suppress  the  plural-
    ity  and  fluidity  of  primitive  belief  systems  and  rituals,  in  the
    pursuit  of  unifying  representations.  The  Enlightenment,  in  turn,
    claims  to  supersede  mythology  by  dissolving  illusory  superstitions
    in  the  name  of  scientific  knowledge.  However,  the  cult  of  reason
    turns  out  to  be  yet  another  myth,  yet  another  totalizing  endea-
    vour.  All  mythologies,  whether  stemming  from  religion  or  from
    science,  ultimately amount  to  the  repression  of human  diversity, to
    the subjugation of variety to  a dominant  value: unity (Adorno  and
    Horkheimer  1986).  Italo  Calvino's  evaluation  of  myth  echoes  the
    view expounded  by Adorno  and  Horkheimer:  'Myth  tends  to  crys-
    tallize instantly, to  fall  into  set patterns,  to  pass  from  the  phase  of
    myth-making into  that  of ritual, and  hence  out  of the  hands  of the
    narrator  into  those  of  the  tribal  institutions  responsible  for  the
    preservation  and  celebration  of  myths'  (Calvino  1987:  23).  In
    contemporary  Western  cultures,  the  crystallizing of  myth  into  'set
    patterns'  is  aided  by  fashion  and  the  media.  The  representations
    they  incessantly  churn  out  for  mass  consumption  are  mythological
    in  the  sense  that  they  are  laden  with  symbolic  connotations. 6  The
    myths  they  embody  are  not,  by  and  large,  allowed  to  grow  or
    expand  in  new  directions.  In  fact,  they  are  frozen  into  signifiers  of
    identity  and  status  by  the  'tribal  institutions'  of  corporational
    economies  which,  while  promoting  decentralization  (most  notably
    through  the  Internet),  simultaneously  display  an  addiction  to
    unity.
      The  obsession  with  unifying  agendas,  which  Adorno  and
    Horkheimer  associate  with  Classical  and  Enlightenment  mytholo-
    gies,  is still rampant  today  and  manifests itself through  the  cults of


    6 1*" The  mythological  status  of  commodities  has  been  exhaustively  analysed  by
    Roland  Barthes, whose theories are  discussed  in Part  I, Chapter  6, Textuality'.

                                44
   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66