Page 21 - Cultural Theory and Popular Culture an Introduction
P. 21

CULT_C01.qxd  10/25/08  16:29  Page 5







                                                                                   Popular culture  5

                      not simply in certain ideas about everyday life. Principally, what Althusser has in mind
                      is the way in which certain rituals and customs have the effect of binding us to the
                      social order: a social order that is marked by enormous inequalities of wealth, status
                      and power. Using this definition, we could describe the seaside holiday or the celebra-
                      tion of Christmas as examples of ideological practices. This would point to the way in
                      which they offer pleasure and release from the usual demands of the social order, but
                      that, ultimately, they return us to our places in the social order, refreshed and ready to
                      tolerate our exploitation and oppression until the next official break comes along. In
                      this sense, ideology works to reproduce the social conditions and social relations neces-
                      sary for the economic conditions and economic relations of capitalism to continue.
                        So far we have briefly examined different ways of defining culture and ideology.
                      What should be clear by now is that culture and ideology do cover much the same con-
                      ceptual landscape. The main difference between them is that ideology brings a polit-
                      ical dimension to the shared terrain. In addition, the introduction of the concept of
                      ideology suggests that relations of power and politics inescapably mark the culture/
                      ideology landscape; it suggests that the study of popular culture amounts to something
                      more than a simple discussion of entertainment and leisure.






                        Popular culture

                      There are various ways to define popular culture. This book is of course in part about
                      that very process, about the different ways in which various critical approaches have
                      attempted to fix the meaning of popular culture. Therefore, all I intend to do for the
                      remainder of this chapter is to sketch out six definitions of popular culture that in their
                      different, general ways, inform the study of popular culture. But first a few words about
                      the  term  ‘popular’.  Williams  (1983)  suggests  four  current  meanings:  ‘well  liked  by
                      many people’; ‘inferior kinds of work’; ‘work deliberately setting out to win favour with
                      the people’; ‘culture actually made by the people for themselves’ (237). Clearly, then,
                      any definition of popular culture will bring into play a complex combination of the dif-
                      ferent meanings of the term ‘culture’ with the different meanings of the term ‘popular’.
                      The history of cultural theory’s engagement with popular culture is, therefore, a history
                      of the different ways in which the two terms have been connected by theoretical labour
                      within particular historical and social contexts.
                        An obvious starting point in any attempt to define popular culture is to say that
                      popular culture is simply culture that is widely favoured or well liked by many people.
                      And, undoubtedly, such a quantitative index would meet the approval of many people.
                      We could examine sales of books, sales of CDs and DVDs. We could also examine
                      attendance records at concerts, sporting events, and festivals. We could also scrutinize
                      market research figures on audience preferences for different television programmes.
                      Such counting would undoubtedly tell us a great deal. The difficulty might prove to be
                      that, paradoxically, it tells us too much. Unless we can agree on a figure over which
   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26