Page 464 - Cultural Studies of Science Education
P. 464

Chapter 36
            Are We Creating the Achievement Gap?
            Examining How Deficit Mentalities Influence

            Indigenous Science Curriculum Choices



            Jennifer Lance Atkinson




            Chigeza and Whitehouse highlight a significant negotiation indigenous Australian
            children face each day at school. The bridge between different languages presents
            a  challenge  for  the  students  to  score  well  on  standardized  science  assessments.
            Rather than truly assessing students’ knowledge of science concepts, Chigeza and
            Whitehouse provide a wealth of evidence, which supports that students may be
            tested on the mastery of standard Australian English rather than science concepts
            due to their home language being different than English. Chigeza and Whitehouse
            recommend that science educators and researchers should develop more appropri-
            ate classroom instruction to help students successfully navigate between languages
            when  learning  science.  Language  is  highly  contextual  and  as  Chigeza  and
            Whitehouse discuss, students are characterized by their language use. Despite their
            science  knowledge,  indigenous  Australian  students  are  deemed  deficient  based
            upon standardized testing scores because of their language.
              While I agree that negotiating language differences between academic and home
            environments is extremely important in preparing students for different discourses,
            I see a more troubling problem associated with Chizega’s and Whitehouse’s study,
            which reflects assumptions found in western society. My own experience as a sci-
            ence teacher enables me to understand that students’ discourses between home and
            school are rarely congruent in the science classroom. The vocabulary, style, rules
            of argumentation, and structure of “science talk” is substantially different. Helping
            students not only learn the language and concepts of science, but also having them
            incorporate the ideals of science into classroom discourse is a constant negotiation.
            I use an example of bridging different discourses from my classroom to illustrate
            that successful teaching and learning can still produce an “achievement gap” when
            standards are taught and the language negotiation is successful.
              Consider  the  following  lesson  I  taught  concerning  ecological  succession  to
            secondary students. Believing that learning should have a rich and complex con-
            text, the students and I hiked outside, drew pictures of the landscape, described



            J.L. Atkinson
            Washington-Wilkes Comprehensive High School


            D.J. Tippins et al. (eds.), Cultural Studies and Environmentalism,    439
            Cultural Studies of Science Education, Vol. 3, DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3929-3_36,
            © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469