Page 13 - Culture Media Language Working Papers in Cultural Studies
P. 13

1
                  Cultural Studies and the Centre: some
                         problematics and problems*
                                      Stuart Hall








                                                                        1
            The first issue of Working Papers in Cultural Studies appeared in 1972.  The
            title ‘Working Papers’ was deliberately intended to set the terms of our approach
            in a number of respects. This was not the scholarly journal of the field—which,
                                   2
            indeed, hardly as yet existed.  We laid no proprietary claim on it. We recognized
            that, if Cultural Studies ‘took off’, it would deploy a greater variety of approaches
            than we could reproduce within the Birmingham Centre (at that time, less than
            half its present size). We also recognized that a particular ‘mix’ of disciplines
            woven together at Birmingham to form the intellectual base of Cultural Studies
            would not necessarily  be  reproduced exactly elsewhere.  We could imagine
                                                           3
            Cultural Studies degrees or research based, just as effectively, on visual (rather
            than literary) texts, on social anthropology  (rather than sociology) and with a
            much stronger input of historical studies than we drew on in the early days. Such
                                                                        4
            courses have indeed been initiated since then—with conspicuous success.  The
            Centre had, perforce, to work with the intellectual raw materials it had to hand. It
            chose  to specialize in those areas  which the small staff felt capable of
                      5
            supervising.  It approached the problems of interdisciplinary research from those
            more  established disciplines already present in the complement of staff  and
            students  working in Birmingham  at that time.  But we  tried  not to make  the
                                                  6
            mistake  of confusing these  starting positions—  over which  we had  relatively
            little control—with a  theoretically informed definition of Cultural Studies as
            such. Hence, the journal specifically refused, at the outset, to be a vehicle for
            defining the range and scope of Cultural Studies in a definitive or absolute way.
            We rejected, in short,  a descriptive  definition or  prescription of the field.  It
                                                                          7
            followed that, though the journal did not offer itself as a conclusive definition of
            Cultural Studies, it did confront, from its first issue, the consequences of this
            refusal: namely, the need for a sustained work of theoretical clarification.
              On the other hand, the journal was conceived as an intellectual intervention. It
            aimed to define and to occupy a space. It was deliberately designed as a ‘house
            journal’—a journal or tendency, so to speak. Nearly all of its contributors were
            Centre members.  Its aim was to put Cultural Studies on the intellectual map. It
                          8
            declared  an interest in advancing critical  research  in this field. The phrase,
   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18