Page 190 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 190

180 CULTURAL DEPENDENCY AND THE MASS MEDIA
            tendency on the part of some critics of cultural imperialism to employ the terms
            ‘authentic’ or ‘traditional’ in respect to local culture in a manner similar to the
            frequent use of the term ‘community’ in some western countries, that is, with
            mythological, ‘gemeinschaft’ connotations of cosy togetherness.
              It is also true that resistance to inter-cultural media penetration can at times be
            expensive. For a nation that is committed to television,  a  decision to reduce
            dependence  on cheap programme imports  may well  require  a much heavier
            outlay on expensive home productions which, because of poor facilities or
            inexperience, may seem to lack some of the polished gloss of western soap opera.
            But the decision to restrict television time, or even do without television, is still
            available, even if  politically difficult. Resources  for  indigenous media
            development may be affected  by the availability of international advertising.
            Even  where there is no  direct restriction on such advertising, however, its
            availability can be reduced indirectly by policies such as import restriction or
            nationalization. In Guyana, for instance, where such policies were adopted in the
            1970s,  the  proportion  of total  media advertising accounted for by non-local
            advertisers declined from 70 per cent to 10 per cent in the period 1964–76, and
            this was responsible in part for a deterioration  of  programme standards, a
            reduction in newspaper titles and cancellation of plans for expansion of regional
            broadcast stations (Sanders, 1978).
              There can be no adequate evaluation of inter-cultural media penetration which
            does not take into full account the variability of mass media policies adopted by
            individual governments. The  infrastructure of global communication  may be
            very much the development of, and in the control of, the super-powers. But it
            does not necessarily determine what happens within particular nations. Nor is it
            free of internal strains: many western multinational corporations are  in
            competition with one another; there are political and economic conflicts between
            the more affluent nations; and smaller nations have found ways and means of
            bringing collective pressure to bear on the more powerful nations.
              The danger of assuming a simple one-way responsibility for the shortcomings
            of the international communication system is illustrated by the case of the major
            western news agencies, which are frequently accused of ethnocentricity in their
            handling  of news coverage  on which  most ThirdWorld nations rely. Such
            criticism tends to underestimate the  extent to  which the  agencies have
            regionalized their services, the increase over time in the overall volume of news
            which they  provide, and  the problems  inherent in defining what  in fact
            constitutes adequate regionalization. The major agencies are heavily dependent
            on the output of national news agencies and the national media, partly because
            their resources are in many  areas  thinly  spread, and partly because more and
            more restrictions are imposed upon the  news-gathering activities of foreign
            newsmen. Of equal importance is the willingness of many non-western media to
            depend on western agency coverage even where alternative courses of action are
            available. Matta (1979) has demonstrated the reluctance of élite Latin American
            media  to provide  independent coverage not  only  of  world news but of
   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195