Page 60 - Culture Society and the Media
P. 60

50 THEORIES OF THE MEDIA AND SOCIETY
              It has been partly as a result of these criticisms that more recent developments
            in the Marxist theory of ideology have tended to look back beyond Althusser to
            the work of Antonio Gramsci whose writings on such subjects as culture and
            ideology, the role of intellectuals, and the crucial concept of hegemony afford a
            more flexible, less economistic way of conceptualizing the relationship between
            ideological, social, political and economic processes and relationships. Be this as
            it may, the crucial role that Althusser has played in facilitating the development
            of significantly new lines of approach to the study of the media should not be
            underestimated. The stress that he placed on the active role of ideology, on the
            part that it played in  shaping the consciousness  of social agents, formed the
            central conduit through which developments in structuralism and semiology have
            both  entered into and lastingly altered Marxist approaches to the media  in
            placing questions concerning the politics of signification at least on a par with
            the traditional Marxist concern with the analysis of patterns of media ownership
            and control. It may be, as subsequent critics have argued (see Lovell, 1980), that
            Althusser—or, more accurately perhaps, those following him—bent the stick too
            far, resulting in a  tendency towards purely formalist ‘readings’ or
            ‘deconstructions’ of the signifying mechanisms of media forms which paid scant
            regard  to  the conditions of their  production or to  the real history  of their
            reception by different sections of the audience. A valid measure of Althusser’s
            importance, however, is discernible in the fact that it has proved impossible for
            those who have wished to raise such questions to do so without acknowledging
            that his contribution has decisively altered the ways in which they need to be
            posed.

                                      REFERENCES


            Adorno, T.W. (1974a) Minima Moralia, London, New Left Books.
            Althusser, L. (1971) ‘Ideology  and ideological state apparatuses’,  in  Lenin and
               Philosophy, and Other Essays, London, New Left Books.
            Anderson, P. (1969) ‘Components  of  the national culture’, in Cockburn,  A.  and
               Blackburn, R. (eds) Student Power: Problems, Diagnosis, Action, Harmondsworth,
               Penguin.
            Arnold, M. (1971) Culture and Anarchy, Indianapolis, Bobbs-Merrill.
            Bell, D. (1960) ‘America as a mass society: a critique’, in The End of Ideology: on the
               Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties, New York, Free Press.
            Benjamin, W. (1970) ‘The work of art in  the age of mechanical reproduction’, in
               Illuminations: Essays and Reflections, London, Jonathan Cape.
            Bennett, T. (1979) Formalism and Marxism, London, Methuen.
            Bottomore, T.B. and Rubel, M. (1965) Karl Marx: Selected Writings in Sociology and
               Social Philosophy, Harmondsworth, Penguin.
            Bramson, L. (1961) The Political Context of Sociology, New Jersey, Princeton University
               Press.
            Brecht, B. (1964) On Theatre, London, Methuen.
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65