Page 351 - Culture Technology Communication
P. 351

334                          Index


            CMC (cont.) factors in diffusion of,  problem by Korean students, 257;
              271 (see also technology diffu-  and unequal access, 251. See also
              sion); as failing to impose West-  access
              ern values, 317f. (see also   commodification, 27; of moving
              technological instrumentalism);  messages, vs. ritual model of
              “gender-blind” spaces of (Her-  communication, 55; of personal
              ring), 22; global—culture as de-  information, 58; of works, 60
              pending on texts, shared values,  communication, development, 214;
              316; as less hospitable to women,  non-verbal, see non-verbal com-
              181; Japanese lack of enthusiasm  munication; organizational,
              for, 13; as liberating, democratiz-  214f.; preferences (individual),
              ing, 261 (see also democracy); and  34n. 14; public, role of in modern
              McWorld (global monoculture),   societies (Luhmann), 70; ritual
              295 (see also McWorld); nature of,  model of (Carey), 5, 15f., 55, 64,
              ix; as pop culture phenomenon   (Thai language as use of) 312,
              (Korea, Japan), 262; more enthu-  321f.; “signal function” of
              siasm for in Korea than Japan,  (Habermas), 81; styles, Japan-
              267; as ritual communication    ese, 10f. (see also CSCW, Japan-
              (Thailand), 321; as threat to so-  ese)
              cial stability (Japan), 269; Ya-  theories of: needs and gratifica-
              mada village as success of      tions, 215; active reception, 215
              (Japan), 277. See also access;  transmission view of (Carey), 312;
              anonymity; chat rooms; democ-   transportation model of (Carey),
              racy; electronic networks; face-to-  5, 55, 64 ( see also ritual model
              face; flaming; gender; gender   of). See also: interactive commu-
              empowerment; gender equality;   nication, 6; intercultural commu-
              gender equity, 207f.; Information  nication; interpersonal
              Technology; interactive networks;  communication, 94; non-verbal
              Internet; Internet cafes; listserv,  communication; peripheral
              in-class, 9, 167–80; mailing lists;  awareness
              male communication styles,    communitarian, 241
              164–66; men; Usenet; women    community, computers and (Jones),
            CMC society, Korea as, 276        5; fragmentation of, 56. See also
            collectivism vs. individualism (Hof-  “compunity,” 17, 55; on-line com-
              stede), see individualism vs. col-  munities
              lectivism                     Comparative International Study
            Colonial/Indigenous, 19           on Electronic Information and
            colonialism, British, 5, 289      Communication (Nomura Re-
            commercialization, 27; of the Net, 5,  search Institute), 268–76
              6, 11, 76, 265f. (Japan and   competition, and Internet diffusion,
              Korea); criticized by grassroots  98
              groups (Korea), 251; dangers of  complexity, perceptions of and user
              for electronic democracy, 241f.; as  attitudes, 274
              force in sensationalizing inde-  “compunity” (Jones), 17, 55
              cency (Korea), 248; as limiting  computerization, as changing orga-
              partial publics, 76; recognized as  nizational structure, 214f.
   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356