Page 70 - Cyberculture and New Media
P. 70

Sheizaf Rafaeli, Tsahi Hayat & Yaron Ariel     61
                              ______________________________________________________________
                             Table 3: Knowledge building-Externalization, Combination & Internalization

                             Externalization mode                                    Mean (SD)
                             It is important to me that other Wikipedians will refer to  H  4.66 (1.30)
                             things I’m Writing in Wikipedia                   E   3.70 (1.40)
                                                                               H  5.00 (1.16)
                             Writing in Wikipedia is “team work”
                                                                               E   5.14 (1.20)

                             Combination mode
                             When  people  copy  from  other  sources  into  Wikipedia,  it  E   4.80 (1.40)
                             makes me angry                                    H  5.10 (1.20)
                             When people write inaccuracies in Wikipedia, it makes me  E   4.10 (1.15)
                             angry                                             H  4.30 (1.60)

                             Internalization mode
                             Wikipedia  is  better  in  comparison  to  other  information  H  3.80 (1.1)
                             sources on the Internet                           E   4.19 (1.5)
                                                                               H  5.47 (1.1)
                             Wikipedia contributes to the knowledge of its active users
                                                                               E   5.35 (.70)
                             * Statistically significant differences between English and Hebrew versions
                             ** E=English; Heb=Hebrew

                             8.      Discussion
                                     The survey results reported here  was conducted during the Spring
                             and  Summer  of  2005, prior  to  the  public  furor  around  Seigenthaler’s  false
                                               31
                             Wikipedia  biography ,  and  prior  to  the  publication  of  the  editorial  and
                                                                                32
                             “Quality test” conducted by the editors of the Nature journal.  Our findings
                             regarding  the  knowledge  building  process  indicate  that  Wikipedia  can  be
                             considered  as  a  knowledge  building  community.  Furthermore,  Wikipedia
                             platform  combined  with  Wikipedians’  knowledge  building  norms  provides
                             what was previously referred to elsewhere as “ba”. Exploring Wikipedias as a
                             “ba” facilitator, we propose that Wikipedia provides a unique context for the
                             process  of  knowledge  building.  This  context  is  based  on  Wikipedians
                             perception of Wikipedia as a platform for an egalitarian teamwork. Evidently,
                             we should also account for the fact that within this Wikipedais’ “ba”, there
                             are Wikipedians who call for broader supervision over Wikipedia’s content,
                             and over other Wikipedians.
                                     Based  on  the  examination  of  communal  aspects,  deriving  from
                             Wikipedais’  “ba”,  we  propose  that  Wikipedia  should  be  observed  as  a
                             community. Recall that Wikipedia is a community that has semi “defined”
                             boundaries (the Wikipedia platform). Most Wikipedians do not contact each
   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75