Page 92 - Decision Making Applications in Modern Power Systems
P. 92

Uncertainty management in decision-making Chapter | 2  59


             profit for 10 scenarios. The scenario number 7 with the maximum profit is
             selected and described in the following.
                The optimal generators and ESSs state for 24 hours are given in
             Table 2.7. ESS charging, discharging, and idle states are represented by 21,
             1, and 0. As can be seen in Table 2.2, generator number 3 is a high-cost gen-
             erator, so it is committed in peak-load hours (13 16 hours).
                The proposed algorithm detects that the price of exchanged power is low
             at some hours (1 8 hours), so purchasing power from the upstream network
             is rational for MG’s owner (r 5 0). In this interval, most of the ESS is
             charged. At the higher exchanged power price (10 16 hours), it is beneficial
             for MG to sell surplus power to the upstream network to achieve significant
             benefits. In this interval, ESS is discharged and because the exchanged
             power price exceeds the cost coefficients of all generators, generator number
             2 (high-cost generator) is committed at 13 16 hours. While MG supplies
             their loads, the surplus power is sold to the upstream network (r 5 1).
                The monetary result of the problem consists of MG’s costs, revenues, and
             profits, which are given in Table 2.8.
                It is shown in Table 2.8, at the peak-load hours (11 16), in which the
             value of the power price exceeds generators cost coefficients, MG sells the
             surplus power (that generated by the high-cost generator) to the upstream
             network and receives significant revenues; at this interval, r that shows the
             exchanged power direction with the upstream network is equal to 1. Based
             on the proposed optimal scheduling, the profit of MG is determined as
             $7721.35 for scenario number 7.
                Finally, the expected profit of 10 reduced scenarios based on the proba-
             bility of each scenario can be calculated as follows:

                                         10             10
                                        X              X
                         Expected profit 5  π ω f ω  where  π ω 5 1    ð2:25Þ
                                        ω51             ω51
                According to (2.25), the value of expected profit is $7528.9.


             2.5  Conclusion

             In this chapter a brief overview of uncertainty management in the modern
             power system is studied. The penetration of renewable energy resources, as
             well as load demand deviation, causes different challenges in the operation
             and scheduling of modern power systems. After classifying a variety of
             uncertain parameters in the power system, some useful methods for uncer-
             tainty management are discussed. To demonstrate the uncertainty modeling
             in the power system decision-making process, we considered that a micro-
             grid consists of different generation units (dispatchable units and renewable
             units such as PV and wind). The MG scheduling for profit maximization in
             the presence of multiple uncertain parameters is examined. After the
   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97