Page 200 - Decoding Culture
P. 200

THE RISE OF THE  READE R    193

             But even if this kind of realism is unacceptable - and I have not
           tried to make a sustained case for it here - the problems to which
           it is a response are real enough. Whatever the preferred solution,
           what has to be avoided is a situation in which theories become all
           but immune to empirical arbitration, and research methodologies -
          where they are considered at all - are cast in terms of one accept­
           able  route to  truth.  This is the  situation that has characterized
           cultural studies for much of its history, and which continues to do
           so in its time of 'crisis'. Only by systematic epistemological reflec­
           tion  and  debate  can  we  hope  to  overcome  such  widespread
           methodological confusion.
             Lurking behind these epistemological issues we find still more
           basic theoretical divisions, above all those reflecting fundamental
           assumptions about the nature of social and cultural reality. In the
           course of this book I have tried to  show the ways in which 'top­
           down'  accounts  of the  relationship  between  people  and  their
           culture have dominated cultural studies thinking, whether in the
           form of subject-positioning theories or dominant ideology models.
          Although there are undoubted differences between the perspec­
          tives here represented by Screen theory and the work of the CCCS,
           on this matter - and for all the CCCS' insistence on its interest in
           active agency - they broadly coincide.  In Giddens' sense quoted
           earlier, they are 'objectivist' in inclination, viewing society (via cul­
           ture and ideology) as having priority over the individual. We have
           seen how these traditions of thought faced increasing difficulties in
          conceptualizing various features of culture that simply would not fit
          into predominantly top-down forms of analysis. These failings bred
           dissatisfaction, and from that dissatisfaction has come an acceler­
           ating drift toward  more 'bottom-up' perspectives in the shape of,
           among others,  audience ethnography and 'cultural populism'.
             What we see in audience ethnography and cultural populism is
          a determined attempt to move cultural studies toward subjectivism,





                              Copyrighted Material
   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205