Page 196 - Decoding Culture
P. 196

THE RISE  F   THE  READE R    189
                                               O
           soap  opera)  through  a  strategy  of  redemptive  reading  (cf.
           Brunsdon, 1991) .
             For all  the  attention  attracted by such  endeavours,  however,
           post-structuralist cultural studies has not generally focused on dis­
           crimination as an end in itself. The presumption that it was possible
           and desirable to categorize both individual artefacts and whole cul­
          tural forms in terms of fixed  standards of quality had fallen into
           some disrepute long before the 'postmodern' fashion for aesthetic
           and moral relativism. In practice, aesthetic discrimination had been
           absorbed into more all-encompassing judgements about the social
           and political role played by particular forms and texts. And while
          there is sometimes an element of cultural evaluation in the allega­
          tions  of  'uncritical  cultural  populism'  directed  at  recent
          reader-oriented cultural studies - especially in attributing to the
          likes  of Fiske a  'what  is popular is what is good' position - the
          more forceful arguments have tended to bemoan the loss of a crit­
           ical  edge in political rather than aesthetic terms.  It has certainly
          been argued that recent cultural studies has forgone the capacity to
          make critical statements about the texts  on which  it focuses,  its
          emphasis on active readers permitting only the articulation of dif­
          ferent readers' diverse points of view. But the alternative vantage
          point proposed by  such  challenges  is based  not  so  much  in  the
           domain of aesthetics as in that of politics.
             To be 'critical' then, in the terms posed by those unhappy with
          recent cultural studies, is to relocate  texts and  readers  back into
          the socio-political context from which,  allegedly,  they have been
          removed. Judgements  of quality now become judgements  about
          the  ideological  role  of  texts  and  their  social  consequences,
          informed by a political economy of the media and a more general
          account of the operation of capitalist social formations. In this argu­
          ment, the uncritical pluralism of audience-centred perspectives is
          contrasted with what is presumed to be a more desirable critical





                              Copyrighted Material
   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201