Page 30 - Decoding Culture
P. 30

THE WAY WE WERE     23
            It is here that we should begin, then, with the most general sup­
          positions about culture that informed accounts of the rise of mass
          society and, in turn, the typical post-war approach to media effects.
          Culture, in this analysis, is above all a repository of value: human­
          ity's most significant beliefs and achievements are articulated and
          'stored' in culture. Or, at least, this is how it should be. But culture
          is not of a piece. It is differentiated, not simply in the sense that it
          encompasses  different  cultural  forms,  but  also  in the sense  that
          such  forms  are perceived to be of different  degrees  of  worth.
          Accordingly, culture can only properly be understood in hierarchi­
          cal  terms.  We  can  and  should  make  an  evaluative  distinction
          between, at its simplest, 'high' and 'low' culture. It is 'high' culture
          that carries the key values, that incorporates the richest and most
          significant expressions of human aspirations. 'Low' culture, by con­
          trast, is a vulgarized product of industrial societies: commercially
          motivated,  mass produced,  and  tending  to pander to  the  lowest
          common  denominator of  taste  evinced  by  the  undiscriminating
          mass.
            So pervasive were these assumptions that even those inclined to
          be positive about aspects of modern cultural life routinely adopted
          the hierarchical conception. Take the sociologist Edward Shils, for
          example, in his keynote paper given to an influential 1959 sympo­
          sium. In some contrast to proponents of the orthodox mass society
          thesis, Shils  (1961) did not  see  mass culture in entirely  negative
          terms. He argued that mass society had occasioned a wider spread
          of what he called  'civility'  and  citizenship,  that it had generated a
          growing emphasis on individual dignity, and that it had dispersed
          worthwhile cultural materials far more widely through society than
          had previously been the case. And yet even he remained unprob­
          lematically  willing  to  distinguish  between  levels  of culture  and,
          perhaps more revealing, to label them in unashamedly evaluative
          terms. 'For present purposes,' he writes, ' we shall employ a very





                              Copyrighted Material
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35