Page 33 - Decoding Culture
P. 33

26  DECODING CULTURE

           shared by many critics of orthodox media research in the forma­
           tive period of cultural studies, leading to a wholesale suspicion of
           the  mass  communications  research tradition,  a  suspicion  which
           has survived in cultural studies to this day. The question to which
           we must turn is, then, was this suspicion merited in relation to the
           underlying assumptions of mass society Imedia effects thinking?
             Elsewhere (fudor, 1995: 82-88) I have explored the distinctive
           social  ontology  and  epistemology  of  effects  research,  and what
           follows is a slightly amended version of that discussion. Consider
           first the epistemological assumptions that underwrote the familiar
           methodological  emphases  of  effects  research.  Effects  research
           grew up alongside  twentieth-century  social  sciences,  at  times,
           indeed, acting as a testing ground for their latest methodological
           innovations. Unsurprisingly, it exhibits many of the epistemologi­
           cal  commitments  fundamental  to  that  disciplinary  context.  It
           shares mainstream social science's vision of scientific inquiry, one
           centred on the interconnected notions of theory, hypothesis and
           test. To know  the  world  properly  is  to  know  it  scientifically;  to
           know it scientifically is to establish deductively interrelated propo­
           sitions  of  empirical  reference  which,  appropriately  assessed  in
           relation  to evidence, might finally take on the status of 'laws' of
           human behaviour.
              In  practice,  of course,  neither  effects  research  nor social  sci­
           ences more generally lived up to this hypothetico-deductive  (H-D)
           ideal. 'Laws' were never satisfactorily established, and hypotheses
           were more  often  ad hoc empirical  generalizations  than  deduced
           implications of precisely formulated theories. But the fact that the
           H-D model was not directly reflected in most research practice did
           not mean that its distinctive conceptual emphases were of no sig­
           nificance.  In three interrelated areas, in particular, it had a signal
           influence on the development of effects research: in its presuppo­
           sition that an 'observation language' can be established to generate





                              Copyrighted Material
   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38