Page 38 - Decoding Culture
P. 38

THE WAY WE WERE  31

          individual and society and hence between audience and communi­
          cations media.  Thus, even though some researchers  refused  to
          accept the mainstream's consensus model of social order, propos­
          ing instead  a  social world  of media manipulation,  social  conflict
          and  power relations,  they  always  retained  some version  of the
          socialized actor as a central concept. Throughout effects research
          individuals were (and are) conceptualized as 'at the receiving end'
          with effects represented as general processes of socio-cultural con­
           straint  applied  via  the  media  of  mass  communications.  This
          commitment at the level of tacit social ontology inevitably restricts
          capacity to conceptualize the complex interrelation of social agency
          with the larger cultural context. And even though this longer-term
          'cultural  effect'  (Tudor,  1979)  is  in  principle  the  focus  for
          Cultivation Analysis  (Gerbner and  Gross,  1976;  Gerbner et al. ,
           1986;  Signorielli and Morgan,  1990)  with its interest in the  'culti­
          vation  of culture',  in  practice  the  promise  of that  approach  is
          undercut both by its empiricist epistemology and by its traditional
          media research ontology. The heavy  television viewers central to
          Cultivation Analysis remain victims of culture rather than parties to
          the constant construction and reconstruction of their cultural envir­
          onments.
             How can  we  summarize this now rather complicated picture?
           One  way  of ordering  things  is  to  observe  that  the  mass  cul­
          ture/media effects tradition has both a descriptive and an analytic
          version. The  descriptive version is that normally encountered in
          public  debate  about  mass culture  and  the media. both  in  the
          heyday of the mass society thesis and in the context of more recent
          moral panics about media effects. Here an array of often anecdotal
          evidence  is  used  to  buttress  empirical generalizations  about  the
          power of the media to effect individual attitudes, values and behav­
          iour.  Such  'findings'  are,  in  turn,  marshalled  in  support of the
          general mass culture diagnosis. Society is openly seen as in a state





                              Copyrighted Material
   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43